Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Dec;61(8):556-62.
doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqr068. Epub 2011 Oct 19.

Systematic review of rotator cuff tears in workers' compensation patients

Affiliations

Systematic review of rotator cuff tears in workers' compensation patients

K A R Kemp et al. Occup Med (Lond). 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Background: The burden imposed by workplace rotator cuff (RC) injuries has been reasonably defined. However, literature associated with the demographic characteristics and 'best practices' to manage such injuries among workers' compensation (WC) patients is scant.

Aims: To consolidate the existing literature on full-thickness RC tears among WC patients. Subject, shoulder and injury characteristics were examined to determine if and how WC recipients may differ from their non-compensable counterparts.

Methods: A systematic search (databases, clinical practice guideline web resources, conference proceedings and reference lists) revealed 450 abstracts. Two blinded reviewers independently assessed abstracts for inclusion. Sixty abstracts were subsequently included in a blinded full manuscript review. Seventeen of these manuscripts (3.8% of sample; 11 intervention and 6 determinant) were included in the present review.

Results: Previous studies demonstrate that operative interventions are appropriate for full-thickness RC tears as substantial gains in range of motion, strength and quality of life were witnessed within the first post-operative year. Non-operative interventions, including workplace-based work hardening, physical therapy and the use of an early referral system, were shown to improve outcomes. Conflicting results exist with respect to determinants such as age and sex. Importantly, WC patients had consistently poorer outcomes than non-WC patients.

Conclusions: Our results show that although WC patients experience substantial benefits from various treatments for full-thickness RC tears, disparities exist between them and their non-WC counterparts. The lack of WC-specific literature limited our results. Larger studies, particularly ones comparing WC patients with their non-compensable counterparts, are crucial to allow for future evidence-based recommendations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types