Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011:4:213-20.
doi: 10.2147/CEG.S24063. Epub 2011 Sep 14.

Comparator pH study to evaluate the single-dose pharmacodynamics of dual delayed-release dexlansoprazole 60 mg and delayed-release esomeprazole 40 mg

Affiliations

Comparator pH study to evaluate the single-dose pharmacodynamics of dual delayed-release dexlansoprazole 60 mg and delayed-release esomeprazole 40 mg

Michael Kukulka et al. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2011.

Erratum in

  • Erratum: corrigendum.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2011;4:255. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S26569. Epub 2011 Oct 14. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2011. PMID: 22162928 Free PMC article.

Abstract

Background: This paper describes a Phase 1, single-center, randomized, open-label, two-period crossover study which compared the pharmacodynamic effects of single doses of dexlansoprazole modified-release 60 mg and esomeprazole 40 mg on 24-hour intragastric pH in healthy adult subjects.

Methods: Forty-four subjects aged 20-54 years were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to two sequence groups defining the order in which they received dexlansoprazole and esomeprazole in periods 1 and 2. Primary pharmacodynamic end points over 24 hours postdose were percentage of time with intragastric pH > 4 and mean pH, and secondary pharmacodynamic end points were percentage of time intragastric pH > 4, and mean pH at 0-12 hours, and at >12-24 hours postdose. Each drug was given after an overnight fast and one hour before breakfast. Continuous pH recording began immediately before dosing through to 24 hours postdose.

Results: At 0-24 hours postdose, the mean percentage of time with pH > 4 for dexlansoprazole and esomeprazole was 58% and 48%, respectively; the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.003). The average of mean pH values at 0-24 hours postdose for dexlansoprazole and esomeprazole were 4.3 and 3.7, respectively; the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). At >12-24 hours postdose, mean percentage of time with pH > 4 and average of mean pH were greater for dexlansoprazole (60% and 4.5, respectively) compared with esomeprazole (42% and 3.5, respectively); the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001 for both intervals). At 0-12 hours postdose, the difference in dexlansoprazole and esomeprazole values for the pharmacodynamic end points was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: For the entire 24-hour postdose period, predominantly resulting from the >12-24-hour postdose interval, the average intragastric pH following a single dose of dexlansoprazole 60 mg was higher compared with that observed following a single dose of esomeprazole 40 mg, and the difference was statistically significant.

Keywords: TAK-390MR; esomeprazole; intragastric pH; pharmacokinetics; proton pump inhibitor; single dose.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean intragastric pH from 0 to 24 hours postdose after single oral doses of dexlansoprazole modified-release 60 mg (n = 43) and esomeprazole 40 mg (n = 44) delayed-release capsules.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean percentage of time with intragastric pH > 4.0 at 0–24 hours, 0–12 hours, and >12–24 hours after single oral doses of dexlansoprazole modified-release 60 mg and esomeprazole 40 mg delayed-release capsules (n = 43). Only subjects who had valid pharmacodynamic parameters estimated for both periods were included in the pharmacodynamic analyses for that parameter. Notes: *P ≤ 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean intragastric pH at 0–24 hours, 0–12 hours, and >12–24 hours after single oral doses of dexlansoprazole modified-release 60 mg and esomeprazole 40 mg delayed-release capsules (n = 43). Only subjects who had valid pharmacodynamic parameters estimated for both periods were included in the pharmacodynamic analyses for that parameter. Notes: *P ≤ 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean plasma concentration-time curves of dexlansoprazole and esomeprazole after single oral doses of dexlansoprazole modified-release 60 mg (n = 43) and esomeprazole 40 mg (n = 44) delayed-release capsules in healthy subjects, linear scale.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. DeVault KR, Talley NJ. Insights into the future of gastric acid suppression. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;6:524–532. - PubMed
    1. Vakily M, Zhang W, Wu J, Atkinson SN, Mulford D. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a known active PPI with a novel dual delayed release technology, dexlansoprazole MR: A combined analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009;25:627–638. - PubMed
    1. Metz DC, Vakily M, Dixit T, Mulford D. Review article: Dual delayed release formulation of dexlansoprazole MR, a novel approach to overcome the limitations of conventional single release proton pump inhibitor therapy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;29:928–937. - PubMed
    1. Deerfield, IL: Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc; 2011. Dexilant® (dexlansoprazole) delayed release capsules [package insert]
    1. Wilmington, DE: AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP; 2011. Nexium® (esomeprazole magnesium) delayed-release capsules [package insert]