Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Oct 24;40(1):97-100.
doi: 10.1515/JPM.2011.112.

Improved overall delivery documentation following implementation of a standardized shoulder dystocia delivery form

Affiliations

Improved overall delivery documentation following implementation of a standardized shoulder dystocia delivery form

Vasiliki A Moragianni et al. J Perinat Med. .

Abstract

Objective: Our objective was to evaluate whether using a standardized shoulder dystocia delivery form improved documentation. A standardized delivery form was added to our institution's obstetrical record in August 2003.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted comparing 100 vaginal deliveries complicated by shoulder dystocia before, and 81 after implementation of the standardized delivery form. The two groups were compared in terms of obstetric characteristics, neonatal outcomes and documentation components.

Results: Charts that included the standardized delivery form were more likely to contain documentation of estimated fetal weight (82.7% vs. 39.0% without the form, P<0.001) and head-to-shoulder delivery interval (76.5% vs. 15.0% without the form, P<0.001). Both groups were statistically similar in terms of documenting estimated blood loss and fetal weight, umbilical cord pH, type and order of maneuvers utilized to relieve the shoulder dystocia, and second stage duration.

Conclusions: Inclusion of a standardized form in the delivery record improves the rate of documentation of both shoulder dystocia-specific and general delivery components.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Similar articles

References

    1. Acker DB. A shoulder dystocia intervention form. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;78:150–1. - PubMed
    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Shoulder dystocia. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 40. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:1045–50. - PubMed
    1. Deering S, Poggi S, Hodor J, Macedonia C, Satin AJ. Evaluation of residents’ delivery notes after a simulated shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:667–70. - PubMed
    1. Deering SH, Tobler K, Cypher R. Improvement in documentation using an electronic checklist for shoulder dystocia deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:63–6. - PubMed
    1. Goffman D, Heo H, Chazotte C, Merkatz IR, Bernstein PS. Using simulation training to improve shoulder dystocia documentation. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:1284–7. - PubMed

Publication types