Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Oct 21:11:129.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-11-129.

Varied overground walking-task practice versus body-weight-supported treadmill training in ambulatory adults within one year of stroke: a randomized controlled trial protocol

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Varied overground walking-task practice versus body-weight-supported treadmill training in ambulatory adults within one year of stroke: a randomized controlled trial protocol

Vincent G DePaul et al. BMC Neurol. .

Abstract

Background: Although task-oriented training has been shown to improve walking outcomes after stroke, it is not yet clear whether one task-oriented approach is superior to another. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the Motor Learning Walking Program (MLWP), a varied overground walking task program consistent with key motor learning principles, to body-weight-supported treadmill training (BWSTT) in community-dwelling, ambulatory, adults within 1 year of stroke.

Methods/design: A parallel, randomized controlled trial with stratification by baseline gait speed will be conducted. Allocation will be controlled by a central randomization service and participants will be allocated to the two active intervention groups (1:1) using a permuted block randomization process. Seventy participants will be assigned to one of two 15-session training programs. In MLWP, one physiotherapist will supervise practice of various overground walking tasks. Instructions, feedback, and guidance will be provided in a manner that facilitates self-evaluation and problem solving. In BWSTT, training will emphasize repetition of the normal gait cycle while supported over a treadmill, assisted by up to three physiotherapists. Outcomes will be assessed by a blinded assessor at baseline, post-intervention and at 2-month follow-up. The primary outcome will be post-intervention comfortable gait speed. Secondary outcomes include fast gait speed, walking endurance, balance self-efficacy, participation in community mobility, health-related quality of life, and goal attainment. Groups will be compared using analysis of covariance with baseline gait speed strata as the single covariate. Intention-to-treat analysis will be used.

Discussion: In order to direct clinicians, patients, and other health decision-makers, there is a need for a head-to-head comparison of different approaches to active, task-related walking training after stroke. We hypothesize that outcomes will be optimized through the application of a task-related training program that is consistent with key motor learning principles related to practice, guidance and feedback.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT00561405.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design and timelines.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Motor Learning Walking Program. Every session includes all seven core tasks described in the centre circle. During or between sessions, the training physiotherapist may adjust the level of challenge of each core task by adding or removing one or more of the task complexity factors described in the outside circles.

References

    1. World Health Organization. The Global Burden of Disease: World Health Organization. 2008. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/GBD_report_2004updat...
    1. Jorgensen H, Nakayama H, Raaschou H, Olsen T. Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1995;76:27–32. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80038-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pound P, Gompertz P, Ebrahim S. A patient-centred study of the consequences of stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation. 1998;12(4):338–47. doi: 10.1191/026921598677661555. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moreland J, DePaul V, DeHueck A, Pagliuso S, Yip D, Pollock B, Wilkins S. Needs assessment of individuals with stroke after discharge from hospital stratified by acute Functional Independence Measure score. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2009;31(26):2185–95. doi: 10.3109/09638280902951846. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Olney S, Richards C. Hemiparetic gait following stroke. Part I: Characteristics. Gait and Posture. 1996;4:136–48. doi: 10.1016/0966-6362(96)01063-6. - DOI

Publication types

Associated data