Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2012 Oct;44(10):576-83.
doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2011.07.016. Epub 2011 Oct 22.

[Abdominal ultrasound: a diagnostic tool within the reach of general practitioners]

[Article in Spanish]
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

[Abdominal ultrasound: a diagnostic tool within the reach of general practitioners]

[Article in Spanish]
Marià Esquerrà et al. Aten Primaria. 2012 Oct.

Abstract

Aim: To assess the impact of training two general practitioners (GPs), on performing low complexity ultrasound examinations of the abdomen with diagnostic competence.

Study design: A non-randomised, prospective, double blind evaluation study of the acquired competence. Ultrasound examinations were performed successively and independently by the GP and the radiologist, and registered on two sheets of an identical case report form.

Setting: Departments of Vic General Hospital and Vic Health Care Centre of the Catalan Health Institute.

Subjects: A total of 120 patients who needed a low complexity abdominal ultrasound from a total amount of 868 ultrasound examinations scheduled.

Main measurements: The kappa index of the primary diagnosis (ultrasound diagnostic conclusion), as well as of the ultrasound findings for each abdominal organ was calculated. A good level of training was considered if a minimum kappa index of 0.80 was attained between general practitioner and radiologist.

Results: After six month running, an "ad interim" analysis showed a kappa index for the primary ultrasound diagnosis of 0.85. At the end of the study, an overall kappa index of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.82-0.98) was achieved. The agreement by organs was also high (pancreas and spleen excluded), as well as sensitivity (>75%) and specificity (>90%).

Conclusions: The results of the study demonstrate the feasibility of the performance, by trained GPs, of ultrasound examinations of low complexity of the abdomen with diagnostic competence.

Objetivo: Evaluar el impacto de la formación, en términos de competencia diagnóstica, de 2 médicos de atención primaria formados para realizar ecografías abdominales de baja complejidad.

Diseño: Estudio no aleatorio prospectivo a doble ciego de evaluación de las competencias adquiridas. La exploración ecográfica se realizó sucesiva e independientemente por el médico de atención primaria y por el radiólogo y los resultados se registraron en formularios distintos de un mismo cuestionario de recogida de datos.

Emplazamiento: Departamentos de radiología del Hospital General de Vic y del ambulatorio de especialidades de Vic del Instituto Catalán de la Salud.

Participantes: Participaron 120 pacientes que requerían una ecografía abdominal de baja complejidad de un total de 868 ecografías programadas.

Mediciones principales: Se calculó el índice kappa del diagnóstico principal (conclusión diagnóstica de la prueba) y el de los hallazgos ecográficos en cada órgano abdominal. Se consideró un buen nivel de formación si se alcanzaba un índice kappa mínimo de 0,80 entre el médico de atención primaria y el radiólogo.

Resultados: En un análisis ad interim a los 6 meses se obtuvo un índice kappa de 0,85 para el diagnóstico ecográfico principal; al finalizar el estudio fue de 0,89 (IC 0,95: 0,82-0,98). La concordancia por órganos fue alta (excepto para páncreas y bazo) y se alcanzó una sensibilidad superior al 75% y una especificidad superior al 90%.

Conclusiones: Los resultados del estudio demuestran cautelosamente que los médicos de atención primaria pueden realizar ecografías abdominales de baja complejidad con competencia diagnóstica.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Esquema general del estudio. Diagrama de las principales acciones del estudio.

References

    1. Speets A.M., Hoes A.W., van der Graaf Y., Kalmijn S., de Wit N.J., Montauban van Swijndregt A.D. Upper abdominal ultrasound in general practice: indications, diagnostic yield and consequences for patient management. Family Pract. 2006;23:507–511. - PubMed
    1. Oakeshott P., Kerry S.M., Williams J.E. Randomized controlled trial of the effect of the Royal College of Radiologists’ guidelines on general practitioners’ referrals for radiographic examination. Br J Gen Pract. 1994;44:197–200. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wordsworth S., Scott A. Ultrasound scanning by general practitioners: is it worthwhile? J Public Health Med. 2002;24:88–94. - PubMed
    1. Keith R., Frisch L. Fetal biometry: A comparison of family physicians and radiologists. Fam Med. 2001;33:111–114. - PubMed
    1. Katerndahl D.A. The primary care physician as ultrasonographer. Postgrad Med. 1982;71:191–196. - PubMed

Publication types