Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Oct 18:2:270.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00270. eCollection 2011.

Therapeutic alliance and outcome of psychotherapy: historical excursus, measurements, and prospects for research

Rita B Ardito  1 , Daniela Rabellino
Affiliations

Therapeutic alliance and outcome of psychotherapy: historical excursus, measurements, and prospects for research

Rita B Ardito et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

This paper proposes a historical excursus of studies that have investigated the therapeutic alliance and the relationship between this dimension and outcome in psychotherapy. A summary of how the concept of alliance has evolved over time and the more popular alliance measures used in literature to assess the level of alliance are presented. The proposal of a therapeutic alliance characterized by a variable pattern over the course of treatment is also examined. The emerging picture suggests that the quality of the client-therapist alliance is a reliable predictor of positive clinical outcome independent of the variety of psychotherapy approaches and outcome measures. In our opinion, with regard to the relationship between the therapeutic alliance and outcome of psychotherapy, future research should pay special attention to the comparison between patients' and therapists' assessments of the therapeutic alliance. This topic, along with a detailed examination of the relationship between the psychological disorder being treated and the therapeutic alliance, will be the subject of future research projects.

Keywords: alliance measures; evaluation of psychotherapeutic process; outcome of psychotherapy; therapeutic alliance; therapist/patient relationship; working alliance.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Agnew-Davies R., Stiles W. B., Hardy G. E., Barkham M., Shapiro D. A. (1998). Alliance structure assessed by the Agnew Relationship Measure (ARM). Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 37, 155–17210.1111/j.2044-8260.1998.tb01291.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alexander L. B., Luborsky L. (1986). “The Penn helping alliance scales,” in The Psychotherapeutic Process: A Research Handbook, eds Greenberg L. S., Pinsoff W. M. (New York: Guilford Press; ), 325–366
    1. Bibring E. (1937). On the theory of the results of psychoanalysis. Int. J. Psychoanal. 18, 170–189
    1. Bordin E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy (Chic.) 16, 252–260
    1. Bowlby J. (1988). A Secure Base: Clinical Applications of Attachment Theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul