Efficacy of a low-cost, inactivated whole-cell oral cholera vaccine: results from 3 years of follow-up of a randomized, controlled trial
- PMID: 22028938
- PMCID: PMC3196468
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001289
Efficacy of a low-cost, inactivated whole-cell oral cholera vaccine: results from 3 years of follow-up of a randomized, controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Killed oral cholera vaccines (OCVs) have been licensed for use in developing countries, but protection conferred by licensed OCVs beyond two years of follow-up has not been demonstrated in randomized, clinical trials.
Methods/principal findings: We conducted a cluster-randomized, placebo-controlled trial of a two-dose regimen of a low-cost killed whole cell OCV in residents 1 year of age and older living in 3,933 clusters in Kolkata, India. The primary endpoint was culture-proven Vibrio cholerae O1 diarrhea episodes severe enough to require treatment in a health care facility. Of the 66,900 fully dosed individuals (31,932 vaccinees and 34,968 placebo recipients), 38 vaccinees and 128 placebo-recipients developed cholera during three years of follow-up (protective efficacy 66%; one-sided 95%CI lower bound = 53%, p<0.001). Vaccine protection during the third year of follow-up was 65% (one-sided 95%CI lower bound = 44%, p<0.001). Significant protection was evident in the second year of follow-up in children vaccinated at ages 1-4 years and in the third year in older age groups.
Conclusions/significance: The killed whole-cell OCV conferred significant protection that was evident in the second year of follow-up in young children and was sustained for at least three years in older age groups. Continued follow-up will be important to establish the vaccine's duration of protection.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00289224.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Nguyen reports being an employee of the Company for Vaccine and Biologicals Production. Dr. Rao reports being an employee of Shantha Biotechnics Inc. Dr. Lopez reports becoming an employee of Pfizer Inc. by the time the results were available. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures
References
-
- Lopez Al, Clemens J, Deen J, Jodar L. Cholera vaccines for the developing world. Human Vacc. 2008;4:165–169. - PubMed
-
- Cholera vaccines: WHO position paper. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2010;85:117–128. - PubMed
-
- Trach DD, Clemens JD, Ke NT, Thuy HT, Son ND, et al. Field trial of a locally produced, killed, oral cholera vaccine in Vietnam. Lancet. 1997;349:231–235. - PubMed
-
- Clemens JD, Sack DA, Harris JR, van Loon F, Chakraborty J, et al. Field trial of oral cholera vaccines in Bangladesh: Results from three-year follow-up. Lancet. 1990;335:270–273. - PubMed
-
- Sur D, Lopez A, Kanungo S, Paisley A, Manna B, et al. Efficacy and safety of a modified killed whole-cell oral cholera vaccine in India: an interim analysis of a cluster-randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374:1694–1702. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
