Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Oct;16(10):106002.
doi: 10.1117/1.3631799.

Detection of intestinal dysplasia using angle-resolved low coherence interferometry

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Detection of intestinal dysplasia using angle-resolved low coherence interferometry

Neil Terry et al. J Biomed Opt. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

Angle-resolved low coherence interferometry (a/LCI) is an optical biopsy technique that allows for depth-resolved, label-free measurement of the average size and optical density of cell nuclei in epithelial tissue to assess the tissue health. a/LCI has previously been used clinically to identify the presence of dysplasia in Barrett's Esophagus patients undergoing routine surveillance. We present the results of a pilot, ex vivo study of tissues from 27 patients undergoing partial colonic resection surgery, conducted to evaluate the ability of a/LCI to identify dysplasia. Performance was determined by comparing the nuclear morphology measurements with pathological assessment of co-located physical biopsies. A statistically significant correlation between increased average nuclear size, reduced nuclear density, and the presence of dysplasia was noted at the basal layer of the epithelium, at a depth of 200 to 300 μm beneath the tissue surface. Using a decision line determined from a receiver operating characteristic, a/LCI was able to separate dysplastic from healthy tissues with a sensitivity of 92.9% (13/14), a specificity of 83.6% (56/67), and an overall accuracy of 85.2% (69/81). The study illustrates the extension of the a/LCI technique to the detection of intestinal dysplasia, and demonstrates the need for future in vivo studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
a/LCI system diagram. (a) System illustration, (b) probe tip assembly illustration showing delivered (dark gray) and scattered (light gray) light, and (c) photograph of the endoscopic probe pictured next to a U.S. dime for scale. Illustration adapted from Zhu et al. (Ref. 22).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Typical a/LCI data. (a) Angle-resolved depth scan of light scattered from tissue. Lighter shades of gray indicate an increased amount of scattered light. (b) A-scan indicating depth increments used for processing. Fifty micrometer segments of the tissue used for processing are indicated. (c) Example angular scan pictured (solid line) with best-fit Mie theory solution (dashed line) and size indicated.
Figure 3
Figure 3
ROC curves corresponding to various discriminators for the third 100-μm segment of the epithelium. AUC (gray area) ratios are indicated. Circles indicate optimal value for each discriminant. (a) Nuclear diameter, AUC = 0.87; (b) nuclear density, AUC = 0.79; (c) nuclear diameter and nuclear density, AUC = 0.91.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Scatter plot showing nuclear size (micrometer) versus nuclear density for the epithelial depth segment 200 to 300 μm beneath the mucosal surface. Each point represents a single optical biopsy, and points are color-coded with respect to their pathological assessment. The dashed black line indicates the ideal decision line for these data for the prediction of dysplasia.

References

    1. Jemal A., Siegel R., Xu J., and Ward E., “Cancer statistics,” Ca-Cancer J. Clin. 60, 277–300 (2010).10.3322/caac.20073 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Winawer S. J., “The multidisciplinary management of gastrointestinal cancer. Colorectal cancer screening,” Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 21, 1031–1048 (2007).10.1016/j.bpg.2007.09.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Rijn J. C., Reitsma J. B., Stoker J., Bossuyt P. M., van Deventer S. J., and Dekker E., “Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review,” Am. J. Gastroenterol. 101, 343–50 (2006).10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00390.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Matsumoto T., Kudo T., Jo Y., Esaki M., Yao T., and Iida M., “Magnifying colonoscopy with narrow band imaging system for the diagnosis of dysplasia in ulcerative colitis: a pilot study,” Gastrointest. Endosc. 66, 957–965 (2007).10.1016/j.gie.2007.04.014 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Costantini M., Sciallero S., Giannini A., et al., “Interobserver agreement in the histologic diagnosis of colorectal polyps. the experience of the multicenter adenoma colorectal study (SMAC).” J. Clin. Epidemiol. 56, 209–214 (2003).10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00587-5 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources