Screening practices of unaffected people at familial risk of colorectal cancer
- PMID: 22030089
- PMCID: PMC3273548
- DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0229
Screening practices of unaffected people at familial risk of colorectal cancer
Abstract
Our objective was to determine screening practices of unaffected people in the general population at moderately increased and potentially high risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) because of their family history of the disease. A total of 1,627 participants in the Australasian Colorectal Cancer Family Registry study were classified into two CRC risk categories, according to the strength of their family history of the disease. We calculated the proportion of participants that adhered to national CRC screening guidelines by age group and for each familial risk category. We carried out a multinomial logistic regression analysis to evaluate the associations between screening and sociodemographic factors. Of the 1,236 participants at moderately increased risk of CRC, 70 (6%) reported having undergone guideline-defined "appropriate" screening, 251 (20%) reported some, but less than appropriate screening, and 915 (74%) reported never having had any CRC screening test. Of the 392 participants at potentially high risk of CRC, three (1%) reported appropriate screening, 140 (36%) reported some, but less than appropriate screening, and 249 (64%) reported never having had any CRC screening test. On average, those of middle age, higher education, and who had resided in Australia longer were more likely to have had screening for CRC. The uptake of recommended screening by unaffected people at the highest familial risk of developing CRC is extremely low. Guidelines for CRC screening are not being implemented in the population. More research is needed to identify the reasons so as to enable development of strategies to improve participation in screening.
©2011 AACR.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A population-based cross-sectional study of colorectal cancer screening practices of first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients.BMC Cancer. 2013 Jan 10;13:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-13. BMC Cancer. 2013. PMID: 23305355 Free PMC article.
-
Screening practices of Australian men and women categorized as "at or slightly above average risk" of colorectal cancer.Cancer Causes Control. 2012 Nov;23(11):1853-64. doi: 10.1007/s10552-012-0067-y. Epub 2012 Sep 26. Cancer Causes Control. 2012. PMID: 23011536 Free PMC article.
-
Individual- and provider-level factors associated with colorectal cancer screening in accordance with guideline recommendation: a community-level perspective across varying levels of risk.BMC Public Health. 2013 Mar 20;13:248. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-248. BMC Public Health. 2013. PMID: 23514586 Free PMC article.
-
Rising incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer in Australia over two decades: report and review.J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jan;30(1):6-13. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12792. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015. PMID: 25251195 Review.
-
Factors affecting patient adherence to publicly funded colorectal cancer screening programmes: a systematic review.Public Health. 2021 Jan;190:67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.10.025. Epub 2020 Dec 21. Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33360029
Cited by
-
Screening uptake of colonoscopy versus fecal immunochemical testing in first-degree relatives of patients with non-syndromic colorectal cancer: A multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, randomized trial (ParCoFit study).PLoS Med. 2023 Oct 24;20(10):e1004298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004298. eCollection 2023 Oct. PLoS Med. 2023. PMID: 37874831 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Ethnic differences and predictors of colonoscopy, prostate-specific antigen, and mammography screening participation in the multiethnic cohort.Cancer Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;38(2):162-7. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2014.02.007. Epub 2014 Mar 22. Cancer Epidemiol. 2014. PMID: 24667037 Free PMC article.
-
A population-based cross-sectional study of colorectal cancer screening practices of first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients.BMC Cancer. 2013 Jan 10;13:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-13. BMC Cancer. 2013. PMID: 23305355 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding the contribution of family history to colorectal cancer risk and its clinical implications: A state-of-the-science review.Cancer. 2016 Sep 1;122(17):2633-45. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30080. Epub 2016 Jun 3. Cancer. 2016. PMID: 27258162 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Quantifying the utility of single nucleotide polymorphisms to guide colorectal cancer screening.Future Oncol. 2016 Feb;12(4):503-13. doi: 10.2217/fon.15.303. Epub 2016 Feb 1. Future Oncol. 2016. PMID: 26846999 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Carstensen B, Soll-Johanning H, Villadsen E, Sondergaard JO, Lynge E. Familial aggregation of colorectal cancer in the general population. Int J Cancer. 1996;68(4):428–35. - PubMed
-
- John DJ, McDermott FT, Hopper JL, Debney EA, Johnson WR, Hughes ES. Cancer risk in relatives of patients with common colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118(10):785–90. - PubMed
-
- Johns LE, Houlston RS. A systematic review and meta-analysis of familial colorectal cancer risk. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96(10):2992–3003. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical