Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Oct 27;12(10):R109.
doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-10-r109.

Variation in global codon usage bias among prokaryotic organisms is associated with their lifestyles

Affiliations

Variation in global codon usage bias among prokaryotic organisms is associated with their lifestyles

Maya Botzman et al. Genome Biol. .

Abstract

Background: It is widely acknowledged that synonymous codons are used unevenly among genes in a genome. In organisms under translational selection, genes encoding highly expressed proteins are enriched with specific codons. This phenomenon, termed codon usage bias, is common to many organisms and has been recognized as influencing cellular fitness. This suggests that the global extent of codon usage bias of an organism might be associated with its phenotypic traits.

Results: To test this hypothesis we used a simple measure for assessing the extent of codon bias of an organism, and applied it to hundreds of sequenced prokaryotes. Our analysis revealed a large variability in this measure: there are organisms showing very high degrees of codon usage bias and organisms exhibiting almost no differential use of synonymous codons among different genes. Remarkably, we found that the extent of codon usage bias corresponds to the lifestyle of the organism. Especially, organisms able to live in a wide range of habitats exhibit high extents of codon usage bias, consistent with their need to adapt efficiently to different environments. Pathogenic prokaryotes also demonstrate higher extents of codon usage bias than non-pathogenic prokaryotes, in accord with the multiple environments that many pathogens occupy. Our results show that the previously observed correlation between growth rate and metabolic variability is attributed to their individual associations with codon usage bias.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that the extent of codon usage bias of an organism plays a role in the adaptation of prokaryotes to their environments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prokaryotes showing extreme GC content have relatively high CAIave values spanning a narrower range. Scatter plot of GC content (x-axis) and CAIave (y-axis) of 773 organisms. Here and in all other figures CAIave is indicated as 'Average CAI'. CAI: Codon Adaptation Index; GC: genome content.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Wide variation in the extents of codon usage bias among various organisms. (a) Distribution of CAIave values among 518 prokaryotes with GC content between 35% and 65%. CAIave is indicated as 'Average CAI'. (b) Negative correlation between organisms' CAIave values and their coefficients of variation. (c) Distribution of CAI values among the genes of Syntrophothermus lipocalidus (high CAIave, indicating low extent of codon usage bias). (d) Distribution of CAI values among the genes of Vibrio vulnificus (low CAIave, indicating high extent of codon usage bias). CAI: Codon Adaptation Index; GC: genome content.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Prokaryotes exhibiting different environmental characteristics show different extents of codon usage bias. The 518 prokaryotes were classified according to various properties, and the distributions of CAIave values of the different classes were compared. (a) Pathogenic prokaryotes show larger extents of codon usage bias than non-pathogenic prokaryotes. CAIave is indicated as 'Average CAI'. (b) Facultative prokaryotes show the largest extent of codon usage bias and anaerobic prokaryotes show the smallest extent. (c) Prokaryotes that live in different salinity environments show a statistically significant difference in CAIave values. (d) Thermophilic and hyperthermophilic prokaryotes show a smaller extent of codon usage bias than mesophilic prokaryotes. CAI: Codon Adaptation Index; GC: genome content.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The ability of an organism to live in multiple habitats is the feature most correlated with the extent of codon usage bias. The 518 prokaryotes were divided into two groups - organisms who each live in a specialized environment and organisms who each live in multiple habitats - and the CAIave values of the different groups were compared. CAIave is indicated as 'Average CAI'. CAI: Codon Adaptation Index; GC: genome content.
Figure 5
Figure 5
No correlation between pairwise evolutionary distances across the phylogenetic tree and difference in CAIave values of pairs of organisms. Scatter plot of the difference in CAIave values between each pair of two organisms in our data (x-axis) and their phylogenetic distances (y-axis). CAIave is indicated as 'Average CAI'. The pairwise distances across the phylogenetic tree were based on the tree generated in [38] and computed as the path length between two organisms through the most recent common ancestor. CAI, Codon Adaptation Index.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Grantham R, Gautier C, Gouy M, Mercier R, Pave A. Codon catalog usage and the genome hypothesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980;8:r49–r62. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gouy M, Gautier C. Codon usage in bacteria: correlation with gene expressivity. Nucleic Acids Res. 1982;10:7055–7074. doi: 10.1093/nar/10.22.7055. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bennetzen JL, Hall BD. Codon selection in yeast. J Biol Chem. 1982;257:3026–3031. - PubMed
    1. Post LE, Nomura M. DNA sequences from the str operon of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1980;255:4660–4666. - PubMed
    1. Ikemura T. Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes: a proposal for a synonymous codon choice that is optimal for the E. coli translational system. J Mol Biol. 1981;151:389–409. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90003-6. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources