Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Oct 27:11:292.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-292.

Five-year trends in epidemiology and prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission, St. Petersburg, Russia: results from perinatal HIV surveillance

Affiliations

Five-year trends in epidemiology and prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission, St. Petersburg, Russia: results from perinatal HIV surveillance

Dmitry M Kissin et al. BMC Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: The HIV epidemic in Russia has increasingly involved reproductive-aged women, which may increase perinatal HIV transmission.

Methods: Standard HIV case-reporting and enhanced perinatal HIV surveillance systems were used for prospective assessment of HIV-infected women giving birth in St. Petersburg, Russia, during 2004-2008. Trends in social, perinatal, and clinical factors influencing mother-to-child HIV transmission stratified by history of injection drug use, and rates of perinatal HIV transmission were assessed using two-sided χ2 or Cochran-Armitage tests.

Results: Among HIV-infected women who gave birth, the proportion of women who self-reported ever using injection drugs (IDUs) decreased from 62% in 2004 to 41% in 2008 (P<0.0001). Programmatic improvements led to increased uptake of the following clinical services from 2004 to 2008 (all P<0.01): initiation of antiretroviral prophylaxis at ≤28 weeks gestation (IDUs 44%-54%, non-IDUs 45%-72%), monitoring of immunologic (IDUs 48%-64%, non-IDUs 58%-80%) and virologic status (IDUs 8%-58%, non-IDUs 10%-75%), dual/triple antiretroviral prophylaxis (IDUs 9%-44%, non-IDUs 14%-59%). After initial increase from 5.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.5%-7.8%) in 2004 to 8.5% (CI 6.1%-11.7%) in 2005 (P<0.05), perinatal HIV transmission decreased to 5.3% (CI 3.4%-8.3%) in 2006, and 3.2% (CI 1.7%-5.8%) in 2007 (P for trend<0.05). However, the proportion of women without prenatal care and without HIV testing before labor and delivery remained unchanged.

Conclusions: Reduced proportion of IDUs and improved clinical services among HIV-infected women giving birth were accompanied by decreased perinatal HIV transmission, which can be further reduced by increasing outreach and HIV testing of women before and during pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
HIV seroprevalence among women giving birth and birth rate among HIV-infected women. Proportion of HIV-infected women giving birth among all HIV-infected women and proportion of HIV-infected women among all women giving birth, St. Petersburg, Russia, 2004-2009, standard HIV surveillance.
Figure 2
Figure 2
History of injection drug use and prevalence of hepatitis C among HIV-infected women giving birth. History of injection drug use, history of injection drug use during pregnancy, and prevalence of hepatitis C among HIV-infected women giving birth, St. Petersburg, Russia, 2004-2008, enhanced perinatal HIV surveillance.
Figure 3
Figure 3
CD4-cell count and viral load testing among HIV-infected women giving birth. CD4-cell counts and percentage covered by immunologic monitoring, viral load and percentage covered by virologic monitoring, HIV-infected women giving birth, St. Petersburg, Russia, 2004-2008, enhanced perinatal HIV surveillance.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Timing and completeness of antiretroviral prophylaxis and perinatal HIV transmission. Percentage of HIV-infected women who started prenatal ARV ≤28 weeks gestation and received a full course dual/triple ARV prophylaxis, rate of perinatal HIV transmission, St. Petersburg, Russia, 2004-2008, enhanced perinatal HIV surveillance.

References

    1. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) and World Health Organization (WHO) AIDS epidemic update: December 2009 Geneva. 2009.
    1. Mathers BM, Degenhardt L, Phillips B, Wiessing L, Hickman M, Strathdee SA, Wodak A, Panda S, Tyndall M, Toufik A, Mattick RP. Global epidemiology of injecting drug use and HIV among people who inject drugs: a systematic review. Lancet. 2008;372:1733–1745. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61311-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burruano L, Kruglov Y. HIV/AIDS epidemic in Eastern Europe: recent developments in the Russian Federation and Ukraine among women. Gend Med. 2009;6:277–289. doi: 10.1016/j.genm.2009.04.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Des Jarlais DC, Arasteh K, Semaan S, Wood E. HIV among injecting drug users: current epidemiology, biologic markers, respondent-driven sampling, and supervised-injection facilities. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2009;4:308–313. doi: 10.1097/COH.0b013e32832bbc6f. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Toussova O, Shcherbakova I, Volkova G, Niccolai L, Heimer R, Kozlov A. Potential bridges of heterosexual HIV transmission from drug users to the general population in St. Petersburg, Russia: is it easy to be a young female? J Urban Health. 2009;86(Suppl 1):121–130. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types