Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep 30:3:RRN1272.
doi: 10.1371/currents.RRN1272.

DEALING WITH DISASTER DATABASES - WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM HEALTH AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS?: Application in practice

Affiliations

DEALING WITH DISASTER DATABASES - WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM HEALTH AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS?: Application in practice

Ishani Kar-Purkayastha et al. PLoS Curr. .

Abstract

There is an increasing move towards facilitating the use of research findings in policy and practice relating to disaster risk reduction and response. One of the key issues is the quality of the evidence available to decision-makers. Disaster databases, as a key resource, represent a tremendous investment of effort and goodwill. However, their usefulness is limited by the variability in how they are compiled, differences in the output they produce, a general lack of comparability and standardization, and the fact that they might produce different results due to the ways they have been created or by chance. One possible solution to this, which has been applied successfully in evidence synthesis in health care is the systematic review. In this study we attempt to show how the systematic review process may be applied to information and data that is held in disaster databases. We demonstrate that systematic reviews of disaster databases can be achieved in a technical sense and the potential value of such reviews, but also discuss the practical difficulties that arise. Key wordsSystematic review, evidence, disaster database.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Guha-Sapir, D., D. Hargitt and P. Hoyois (2004) Thirty Years of Natural Disasters 1974-2003: The Numbers. Presses universitaires de Louvain, Brussels.http://www.emdat.be/old/Documents/Publications/publication_2004_emdat.pdf
    1. Guha-Sapir, D. and R. Below (2006) ‘Collecting data on disasters: easier said than done’. Asian Disaster Management News. 12. pp. 9-10.
    1. Guha-Sapir, D. and R. Below. A Working Paper for the World Bank (2002). The Quality and Accuracy of Disaster Data. A Comparative Analyses of Three Global Data Sets.
    1. Tschoegl, L., with R. Below and D. Guha-Sapir. UNDP/CRED Worksop on Improving Compilation of Reliable Data on Disaster Occurence and Impact (2006). An Analytical Review of Selected Data Sets on Natural Disasters and Impacts.http://www.cred.be/sites/default/files/TschoeglDataSetsReview.pdf
    1. UNISDR (2009) Reducing Disaster Risks through Science: Issues and Actions, The full report of the ISDR Scientific and Technical Committee 2009http://www.unisdr.org/files/11543_STCReportlibrary.pdf