[Modern coronary surgery, the SYNTAX trial and updated guidelines]
- PMID: 22033863
- DOI: 10.1007/s00059-011-3532-6
[Modern coronary surgery, the SYNTAX trial and updated guidelines]
Abstract
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), a modern and safe procedure, is considered the therapy of choice in the care of patients with multi-vessel disease. The 3-year results of the SYNTAX trial not only showed surgical advantages in terms of repeat revascularisation, but the results also demonstrated significant surgical benefit for myocardial infarction and survival rates. More differentiated analyses showed distinct disadvantages in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) associated with the greater complexity of coronary pathology. PCI tends to be a comparable therapeutic option only in certain cases of left main stem lesions or multi-vessel disease. The findings from the SYNTAX study herald a new era in the treatment of coronary heart disease in which, as recommended in the updated guidelines issued by the EACTS/ESC in 2010, the interventionalist and the surgeon, working closely together as a"heart team", provide a sound therapy plan for affected patients.
Similar articles
-
Revascularization of unprotected left main coronary artery disease: strategy selection and systematic risk assessment.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Aug 1;80(2):199-205. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24323. Epub 2012 Apr 17. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012. PMID: 22511269 Review.
-
Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease: Randomized Trials on Myocardial Revascularization and Complete Arterial Bypass Grafting.Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Apr;65(S 03):S167-S173. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1601375. Epub 2017 Apr 7. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017. PMID: 28388767
-
Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in the treatment of unprotected left main stenosis: updated 5-year outcomes from the randomised, non-inferiority NOBLE trial.Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):191-199. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32972-1. Epub 2019 Dec 23. Lancet. 2020. PMID: 31879028 Clinical Trial.
-
A meta-analysis of 3,773 patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention or surgery for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Aug;2(8):739-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.05.020. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009. PMID: 19695542 Review.
-
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;2(10):1079-1088. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2895. JAMA Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28903139 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Guidelines versus reality: is coronary stent application in three-vessel disease standard or the exception?Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Jul;19(6):821-830. doi: 10.1007/s10198-017-0924-4. Epub 2017 Aug 19. Eur J Health Econ. 2018. PMID: 28823011
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous