Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Apr;470(4):1054-64.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2147-9.

Value-based purchasing of medical devices

Affiliations

Value-based purchasing of medical devices

William T Obremskey et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Health care in the United States is known for its continued innovation and production of new devices and techniques. While the intention of these devices is to improve the delivery and outcome of patient care, they do not always achieve this goal. As new technologies enter the market, hospitals and physicians must determine which of these new devices to incorporate into practice, and it is important these devices bring value to patient care. We provide a model of a physician-engaged process to decrease cost and increase review of physician preference items.

Questions/purposes: We describe the challenges, implementation, and outcomes of cost reduction and product stabilization of a value-based process for purchasing medical devices at a major academic medical center.

Methods: We implemented a physician-driven committee that standardized and utilized evidence-based, clinically sound, and financially responsible methods for introducing or consolidating new supplies, devices, and technology for patient care. This committee worked with institutional finance and administrative leaders to accomplish its goals.

Results: Utilizing this physician-driven committee, we provided access to new products, standardized some products, decreased costs of physician preference items 11% to 26% across service lines, and achieved savings of greater than $8 million per year.

Conclusions: The implementation of a facility-based technology assessment committee that critically evaluates new technology can decrease hospital costs on implants and standardize some product lines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chalkidou K, Lord J, Fischer A, Littlejohns P. Evidence-based decision making: when should we wait for more information? Health Aff (Millwood) 2008;27:1642–1653. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1642. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dirschl DR, Goodroe J, Thornton DM, Eiland GW. AOA Symposium. Gainsharing in orthopaedics: passing fancy or wave of the future? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:2075–2083. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01342. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Feder BJ. Artificial joint makers settle kickback case. New York Times. September 28, 2007.
    1. Hahn RW, Klovers KB, Singer HJ. The need for greater price transparency in the medical device industry: an economic analysis. Health Aff (Millwood) 2008;27:1554–1559. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1554. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine. Medical Devices and the Public’s Health: The FDA 510(k) Clearance Process at 35 Years. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.