Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1990 Mar;9(1 Suppl 1):100-10.
doi: 10.1007/BF02205557.

Antibodies to DNA in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Their role in the diagnosis, the follow-up and the pathogenesis of the disease

Affiliations
Review

Antibodies to DNA in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Their role in the diagnosis, the follow-up and the pathogenesis of the disease

R Smeenk et al. Clin Rheumatol. 1990 Mar.

Abstract

In this paper an overview of the present knowledge on antibodies against DNA will be presented. Diagnostic, prognostic and pathogenic aspects of anti-DNA will be highlighted. Detection of antibodies to DNA in the circulation of a patient by an assay selective for high avidity anti-DNA is highly diagnostic for SLE. Anti-DNA of low avidity occurs in rheumatic diseases other than SLE as well, making detection of such antibodies of less diagnostic value. Furthermore, data will be presented that show that the anti-DNA ELISA in its present form is not suited as a diagnostic tool. Not only disease features of SLE vary from patient to patient, anti-DNA avidity does so too. A relationship between anti-DNA avidity and clinical features can be found: high avidity anti-DNA is more abundant in patients with nephritis, low avidity anti-DNA in patients with CNS involvement. Prognostically, a steady increase of the level of high avidity anti-DNA generally heralds an upcoming exacerbation in a patient. Furthermore, 85% of the patients who do not have SLE at the time (high avidity) anti-DNA is detected in their serum, will develop the disease within the next few years. It is noteworthy, that patients with only low avidity anti-DNA in their circulation develop a more mild form of SLE; the (low) avidity of their anti-DNA seldomly increases during the course of their disease. The relevance of anti-DNA to the pathogenesis of SLE still is a matter of debate. On the one hand, the association of parameters of anti-DNA that determine the size of the complexes formed with DNA is in favour of the classical hypothesis, which states that SLE is primarily an immune complex disease. On the other hand, recent data on crossreactions of anti-DNA with phospholipids, glycosaminoglycans and other (poly-negative) structures plead for a role of such crossreactivities in the pathogenesis of SLE.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Immunol Commun. 1983;12(2):177-88 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Med. 1971 Sep 1;134(3 Pt 2):169s-179s - PubMed
    1. Immunol Today. 1985 Apr;6(4):123-7 - PubMed
    1. Immunol Commun. 1980;9(5):515-28 - PubMed
    1. Adv Immunol. 1982;33:167-240 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources