A comparison of assays used for the detection of antibodies to DNA
- PMID: 2203595
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02205553
A comparison of assays used for the detection of antibodies to DNA
Abstract
In this paper we will briefly compare four assays in use in our institute for the measurement of antibodies to DNA: the anti-DNA ELISA, the PEG assay, the indirect immunofluorescence test on Crithidia luciliae and the Farr assay. Although with the use of sera from defined patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) quite good correlations were obtained between the various assays, these correlations were lost upon the use in routine screening of sera of undefined patients. It will be shown that the Farr assay has the highest specificity to systemic lupus erythematosus, whereas the ELISA and the PEG assay are the most sensitive methods. In its present form, however, the ELISA is not suited for the detection of IgM anti-DNA. Furthermore, this technique alone also detects DNA/-anti-DNA complexes present in sera or hybridoma culture supernatants.
Similar articles
-
Clinical significance of anti-nDNA antibodies in ANA-positive systemic lupus erythematosus: comparison of the Farr radioimmunoassay and the Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescent technique.Zhonghua Min Guo Wei Sheng Wu Ji Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1985 Feb;18(1):15-24. Zhonghua Min Guo Wei Sheng Wu Ji Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1985. PMID: 3896689
-
The clinical significance of measuring different anti-dsDNA antibodies by using the Farr assay, an enzyme immunoassay and a Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test.Lupus. 1992 Dec;1(6):369-77. doi: 10.1177/096120339200100606. Lupus. 1992. PMID: 1304405
-
Detection of anti-DNA antibodies: a comparison between two Farr assays, Crithidia luciliae and a human chromosomal substrate assay.Br J Rheumatol. 1988 Jun;27(3):206-10. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/27.3.206. Br J Rheumatol. 1988. PMID: 3288291
-
Clinical aspects of antibodies to DNA.In Vivo. 1988 Jan-Feb;2(1):19-24. In Vivo. 1988. PMID: 2979811 Review.
-
The use of laboratory tests in the diagnosis of SLE.J Clin Pathol. 2000 Jun;53(6):424-32. doi: 10.1136/jcp.53.6.424. J Clin Pathol. 2000. PMID: 10911799 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Monoplex and multiplex immunoassays: approval, advancements, and alternatives.Comp Clin Path. 2022;31(2):333-345. doi: 10.1007/s00580-021-03302-4. Epub 2021 Nov 20. Comp Clin Path. 2022. PMID: 34840549 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Detection of antibodies to DNA: a technical assessment.Mol Biol Rep. 1992 Nov;17(1):71-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01006401. Mol Biol Rep. 1992. PMID: 1287479
-
Significance of stem cell factor and soluble KIT in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.Clin Rheumatol. 1998;17(4):293-300. doi: 10.1007/BF01451008. Clin Rheumatol. 1998. PMID: 9776111
-
Anti-dsDNA: choice of assay in relation to clinical value.Rheumatol Int. 1991;11(3):101-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00304496. Rheumatol Int. 1991. PMID: 1754810 Review.
-
Review: immunoassays in DNA damage and instability detection.Cell Mol Life Sci. 2019 Dec;76(23):4689-4704. doi: 10.1007/s00018-019-03239-6. Epub 2019 Jul 24. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2019. PMID: 31342119 Free PMC article. Review.