Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Apr;27(4):445-51.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1917-0. Epub 2011 Oct 25.

Missed opportunities for advance care planning communication during outpatient clinic visits

Affiliations

Missed opportunities for advance care planning communication during outpatient clinic visits

Sangeeta C Ahluwalia et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Early provider-patient communication about future care is critical for patients with heart failure (HF); however, advance care planning (ACP) discussions are often avoided or occur too late to usefully inform care over the course of the disease.

Objective: To identify opportunities for physicians to engage in ACP discussions and to characterize physicians' responses to these opportunities.

Design: Qualitative study of audio-recorded outpatient clinic visits.

Participants: Fifty-two patients ≥ 65 years recently hospitalized for HF with one or more post-discharge follow-up outpatient visits, and their physicians (n = 44), at two Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.

Approach: Using content analysis methods, we analyzed and coded transcripts of outpatient follow-up visits for 1) patient statements pertaining to their future health or their future physical, psychosocial and spiritual/existential care needs, and 2) subsequent physician responses to patient statements, using an iterative consensus-based coding process.

Results: In 13 of 71 consultations, patients expressed concerns, questions, and thoughts regarding their future care that gave providers opportunities to engage in an ACP discussion. The majority of these opportunities (84%) were missed by physicians. Instead, physicians responded by terminating the conversation, hedging their responses, denying the patient's expressed emotion, or inadequately acknowledging the sentiment underlying the patient's statement.

Conclusions: Physicians often missed the opportunity to engage in ACP despite openers patients provided that could have prompted such discussions. Communication training efforts should focus on helping physicians identify patient openers and providing a toolbox to encourage appropriate physician responses; in order to successfully leverage opportunities to engage in ACP discussions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Goldstein NE, Lynn J. Trajectory of end-stage heart failure: the influence of technology and implications for policy change. Perspect Biol Med. 2006;49:10–8. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2006.0008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murray SA, Kendall M, Boyd K, Sheikh A. Illness trajectories and palliative care. BMJ. 2005;330:1007–11. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7498.1007. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gott M, Barnes S, Parker C, et al. Dying trajectories in heart failure. Palliat Med. 2007;21:95–9. doi: 10.1177/0269216307076348. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Caldwell PH, Arthur HM, Demers C. Preferences of patients with heart failure for prognosis communication. Can J Cardiol. 2007;23:791–6. doi: 10.1016/S0828-282X(07)70829-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harding R, Selman L, Beynon T, et al. Meeting the communication and information needs of chronic heart failure patients. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008;36:149–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.09.012. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types