Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2011 Dec;155A(12):2916-24.
doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34357. Epub 2011 Oct 28.

Genomics really gets personal: how exome and whole genome sequencing challenge the ethical framework of human genetics research

Affiliations
Editorial

Genomics really gets personal: how exome and whole genome sequencing challenge the ethical framework of human genetics research

Holly K Tabor et al. Am J Med Genet A. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Exome sequencing (ES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) putatively identify all adverse functional alleles of protein-coding genes. Accordingly, while ES/WGS are transformative new tools for gene discovery in human and medical genetics research, they also generate new manifestations of ethical issues related to the consent process, data sharing, and return of results. These manifestations have yet to be comprehensively framed, due in part to the rapidity with which new technologies for ES/WGS are being applied and because of a lack of empirical data to provide guidance. Accordingly, researchers, funding agencies, and policy makers have largely dealt with these issues intuitively. We explain how use of ES/WGS challenges: (i) models under which informed consent is typically obtained; (ii) how harms associated with data sharing are considered; and (iii) the nature of obligations surrounding unanticipated findings. We provide broad guidance about interim ways to contend with these issues and make broad recommendations for areas for novel resource and policy development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Ashley EA, Butte AJ, Wheeler MT, Chen R, Klein TE, Dewey FE, Dudley JT, Ormond KE, Pavlovic A, Morgan AA, Pushkarev D, Neff NF, Hudgins L, Gong L, Hodges LM, Berlin DS, Thorn CF, Sangkuhl K, Hebert JM, Woon M, Sagreiya H, Whaley R, Knowles JW, Chou MF, Thakuria JV, Rosenbaum AM, Zaranek AW, Church GM, Greely HT, Quake SR, Altman RB. Clinical assessment incorporating a personal genome. Lancet. 2010;375:1525–1535. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beskow LM, Burke W. Offering individual genetic research results: Context matters. Sci Transl Med. 2010;30:38cm20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bookman EB, Langehorne AA, Eckfeldt JH, Glass KC, Jarvik GP, Klag M, Koski G, Motulsky A, Wilfond B, Manolio TA, Fabsitz RR, Luepker RV NHLBI Working Group. Reporting genetic results in research studies: A summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group. Am J Med Genet Part A. 2006;140A:1033–1040. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Caulfield T, McGuire AL, Cho M, Buchanan JA, Burgess MM, Danilczyk U, Diaz CM, Fryer-Edwards K, Green SK, Hodosh MA, Juengst ET, Kaye J, Kedes L, Knoppers BM, Lemmens T, Meslin EM, Murphy J, Nussbaum RL, Otlowski M, Pullman D, Ray PN, Sugarman J, Timmons M. Research Ethics Recommendations for Whole-Genome Research: Consensus Statement. PLOS Biol. 2008;6:430–435. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cho MK. Understanding incidental findings in the context of genetics and genomics. J Law Med Ethics. 2008;36:280–285. 212. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types