Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2014 Feb;17(1):36-48.
doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00736.x. Epub 2011 Nov 1.

Experience of an information aid for newly diagnosed multiple sclerosis patients: a qualitative study on the SIMS-Trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Experience of an information aid for newly diagnosed multiple sclerosis patients: a qualitative study on the SIMS-Trial

Claudia Borreani et al. Health Expect. 2014 Feb.

Abstract

Background: The SIMS-Trial (ISRCTN81072971) proved the effectiveness, in terms of patient's knowledge and care satisfaction, of an add-on information aid (personal interview with a physician using a navigable CD and take-home booklet) in 120 newly diagnosed patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) from five Italian centres.

Objective: To scrutinize the experience of SIMS-Trial participants in order to gain better understanding of the effectiveness of the information aid and its components.

Design: We performed (i) nine individual semi-structured interviews with a purposeful sample of SIMS-Trial patients who received the information aid, (ii) focus group meeting (FGM) with the physicians who conducted the personal interview, and (iii) FGM with patients' caring neurologists.

Results: Patients' experience with the information aid was positive as it enhanced their understanding of their disease, being viewed as a guided tour of their medical condition. The physicians who conducted the personal interviews were also positive in their overall evaluation but noted an initial difficulty in using the CD. The caring neurologists had limited direct experience of the aid, and their views were confined to utility of the information aid in general. All participants considered the combination of personal interview, CD navigation and take-home booklet essential, but urged a more flexible scheduling of the personal interview. It also emerged that some content required revision and that the aid was unsuitable for patients with primary progressive MS.

Conclusions: The results of the study further support the value of the aid and also provide important indications for improving it and refining indications for use.

Keywords: complex intervention; diagnosis communication; multiple sclerosis; qualitative study; shared decision making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of our phased approach 15 , 16 to developing and evaluating the information aid. FGM, focus group meeting; ISI, individual semi‐structured interview.

References

    1. Cooper GS, Stroehla BC. The epidemiology of autoimmune diseases. Autoimmunity Reviews, 2003; 2: 119–125. - PubMed
    1. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the McDonald’s criteria. Annals of Neurology, 2005; 58: 840–846. - PubMed
    1. Comi G, Filippi M, Barkhof F, the Early Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis Study Group . Effects of early interferon‐beta treatment on conversion to definite multiple sclerosis: a randomized study. Lancet, 2001; 357: 1576–1582. - PubMed
    1. Heesen C, Kolbeck J, Gold SM, Schulz H, Schulz KH. Delivering the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Results of a survey among patients and neurologists. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 2003; 107: 363–368. - PubMed
    1. Johnson J. On receiving the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: managing the transition. Multiple Sclerosis, 2003; 9: 82–88. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data