Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Nov;254(5):776-81; discussion 781-3.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182368f85.

Additional resection of an intraoperative margin-positive proximal bile duct improves survival in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Affiliations

Additional resection of an intraoperative margin-positive proximal bile duct improves survival in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Dario Ribero et al. Ann Surg. 2011 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the survival benefit of additional resection of an intraoperative positive proximal bile duct margin (BD(Marg)) in patients undergoing hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA).

Summary background data: Intraoperative evidence of invasive cancer at the proximal (BD(Marg)) is associated with a dismal survival irrespective of whether a final negative (BD(Marg)) is achieved with an additional resection.

Methods: Clinicopathologic, operative, and survival data of consecutive patients undergone curative intent hepatectomy with bile duct resection (n = 75) for HCC (1989-2010) were analyzed.

Results: Frozen-section examination of the proximal (BD(Marg)) revealed invasive cancer in 19 of the 67 patients. After additional resection, which was possible in 18 cases, a secondary R0 (BD(Marg)) resection was achieved in 15 patients (83.3%), with 2 of these having, at final pathology, positive radial and distal margins. Eventually, 8 patients were classified as R1 and 67 as R0 (54 primary R0 and 13 secondary R0). Median survival of patients who had a secondary R0 resection (30.6 months) was similar to that of primarily R0-resected patients (29.3 months) and significantly better than that of R1 patients (14.9 months) (P = 0.026). Median time to recurrence and site of recurrence were similar in R0 patients independently of the performance of an additional resection. The incidence of biliary fistula was significantly increased (44.4% vs 17.5%; P = 0.02) in patients necessitating a margin re-resection.

Conclusions: Additional resection of a positive proximal (BD(Marg)) , albeit associated with an increased risk of biliary fistula, offers a significant survival benefit and should be attempted whenever possible.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources