Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Nov;6(9):501-6.
doi: 10.1002/jhm.927. Epub 2011 Oct 31.

Behaviors of successful interdisciplinary hospital quality improvement teams

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Behaviors of successful interdisciplinary hospital quality improvement teams

Calie Santana et al. J Hosp Med. 2011 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Although interdisciplinary hospital quality improvement (QI) teams are both prevalent and associated with success of (QI) efforts, little is known about the behaviors of successful interdisciplinary QI teams.

Objective: We examined the specific behaviors of interdisciplinary QI teams in hospitals that successfully redesigned care for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and reduced door-to-balloon times.

Design: Qualitative study.

Participants: Researchers interviewed 122 administrators, providers, and staff in 11 hospitals with substantial improvements in door-to-balloon times.

Measurements: Using data from the in-depth qualitative interviews, the authors identified themes that described the behaviors of interdisciplinary QI teams in successful hospitals.

Results: Teams focused on 5 behaviors: (1) motivating involved hospital staff toward a shared goal, (2) creating opportunities for learning and problem-solving, (3) addressing the impact of changes to care processes on staff, (4) protecting the integrity of the new care processes, and (5) representing each involved clinical discipline effectively.

Conclusions: The behaviors observed may enhance a QI team's ability to motivate the various disciplines involved, understand the care process they must change, be responsive to front-line concerns while maintaining control over the improvement process, and share information across all levels of the hospital hierarchy. Teams in successful hospitals did not avoid interdisciplinary conflict, but rather allowed each discipline to contribute to the team from its own perspective. Successful QI teams addressed the concerns of each involved discipline, modified protocols guided by clinical outcomes, and became conduits of information on changes to care processes to both executive managers and front-line staff.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Wolf FA, Way LW, Stewart L. The efficacy of medical team training: improved team performance and decreased operating room delays. Ann Surg. 2010;252:477–485. - PubMed
    1. Morey JC, Simon R, Jay GD, et al. Error reduction and performance improvement in the Emergency Department through formal team-work training: evaluation results of the MedTeams project. Health Serv Res. 2002;37:1553–1581. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buljac-Samardzic M, Dekker-van Doorn CM, van Wijngaarden JDH, van Wijk KP. Interventions to improve team effectiveness: a systematic review. Health Policy. 2010;94:183–195. - PubMed
    1. Weaver SJ, Lyons R, DiazGranados D, et al. The anatomy of health care team training and the state of practice: a critical review. Acad Med. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f2e907. published Online First: Sep 21, 2010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nelson EC, Batalden PB, Huber TP, et al. Microsystems in health care: part 1. Learning from high-performing front-line clinical units. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2002;28:472–493. - PubMed

Publication types