Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Dec 12;366(1583):3478-90.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0165.

Why disgust matters

Affiliations
Review

Why disgust matters

Valerie Curtis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

The new synthesis about disgust is that it is a system that evolved to motivate infectious disease avoidance. There are vital practical and intellectual reasons why we need to understand disgust better. Practically, disgust can be harnessed to combat the behavioural causes of infectious and chronic disease such as diarrhoeal disease, pandemic flu and smoking. Disgust is also a source of much human suffering; it plays an underappreciated role in anxieties and phobias such as obsessive compulsive disorder, social phobia and post-traumatic stress syndromes; it is a hidden cost of many occupations such as caring for the sick and dealing with wastes, and self-directed disgust afflicts the lives of many, such as the obese and fistula patients. Disgust is used and abused in society, being both a force for social cohesion and a cause of prejudice and stigmatization of out-groups. This paper argues that a better understanding of disgust, using the new synthesis, offers practical lessons that can enhance human flourishing. Disgust also provides a model system for the study of emotion, one of the most important issues facing the brain and behavioural sciences today.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Curtis V., Biran A. 2001. Dirt, disgust, and disease: is hygiene in our genes? Perspect. Biol. Med. 44, 17–3110.1353/pbm.2001.0001 (doi:10.1353/pbm.2001.0001) - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Curtis V., Aunger R., Rabie T. 2004. Evidence that disgust evolved to protect from risk of disease. Proc. R. Soc. B 271(Suppl. 4), S131–S13310.1098/rsbl.2003.0144 (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2003.0144) - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fessler D. M. T., Eng S. J., Navarrete C. D. 2005. Elevated disgust sensitivity in the first trimester of pregnancy: evidence supporting the compensatory prophylaxis hypothesis. Evol. Hum. Behav. 26, 344–35110.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.12.001 (doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.12.001) - DOI - DOI
    1. Schaller M., Duncan L. A. 2007. The behavioral immune system: its evolution and social psychological implications. In Evolution of the social mind: evolutionary psychology and social cognition (eds Forgas J. P., Haselton M. G., von Hippel W.), pp. 293–307 New York, NY: Psychological Press
    1. Oaten M., Stevenson R. J., Case T. I. 2009. Disgust as a disease-avoidance mechanism. Psychol. Bull. 135, 303–32110.1037/a0014823 (doi:10.1037/a0014823) - DOI - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms