Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2011 Dec 13;183(18):E1326-33.
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.110412. Epub 2011 Oct 31.

Effectiveness of a quality-improvement program in improving management of primary care practices

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Effectiveness of a quality-improvement program in improving management of primary care practices

Joachim Szecsenyi et al. CMAJ. .

Abstract

Background: The European Practice Assessment program provides feedback and outreach visits to primary care practices to facilitate quality improvement in five domains (infrastructure, people, information, finance, and quality and safety). We examined the effectiveness of this program in improving management in primary care practices in Germany, with a focus on the domain of quality and safety.

Methods: In a before-after study, 102 primary care practices completed a practice assessment using the European Practice Assessment instrument at baseline and three years later (intervention group). A comparative group of 102 practices was included that completed their first assessment using this instrument at the time of the intervention group's second assessment. Mean scores were based on the proportion of indicators for which a positive response was achieved by all of the practices, on a scale of 0 to 100.

Results: We found significant improvements in all domains between the first and second assessments in the intervention group. In the domain of quality and safety, improvements in scores (mean scores were based on the proportion of indicators for which a positive response was achieved by all of the practices, on a scale of 0 to 100) were observed in the following dimensions: complaint management (from a mean score of 51.2 at first assessment to 80.7 at second assessment); analysis of critical incidents (from 79.1 to 89.6); and quality development, quality policy (from 40.7 to 55.6). Overall scores at the time of the second assessment were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the comparative group.

Interpretation: Primary care practices that completed the European Practice Assessment instrument twice over a three-year period showed improvements in practice management. Our findings show the value of the quality-improvement cycle in the context of practice assessment and the use of established organizational standards for practice management with the Europeaen Practice Assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
The domains and dimensions (and number of indicators) of the European Practice Assessment instrument used to measure the quality of practice management in primary care practices. For an example of how the pentagon shape is used to provide feedback to individual practices, see Appendix 1 (available at www.cmaj.ca/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1503/cmaj.110412/-/DC1). GP = general practitioner.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Selection of primary care practices for the intervention and comparative groups.

Comment in

References

    1. World Health Organization Quality and accreditation in health services. A global review. Geneva (Switzerland): The Organization; 2003
    1. Greenfield D, Braithwaite J. Health sector accreditation research: a systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care 2008;20: 172–83 - PubMed
    1. Hutchison B. Cracks in the foundation: the precarious state of Canada’s primary care infrastructure. Healthc Policy 2007;3:10–6 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Levitt C, Hilts L. Quality in family practice. Book of tools. Hamilton (ON): McMaster Innovation Press; 2010
    1. Quality management directive on medical and dental care [article in German]. Berlin (Germany): Federal Joint Committee (G-BA); 2005. Available: www.g-ba.de/downloads/62-492-3/RL_QM-Vertragsarzt-2005-10-18.pdf (accessed 2011 June 10).

Publication types