Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Nov 1;8(12):711-22.
doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2011.205.

Screening for colorectal cancer: established and emerging modalities

Affiliations
Review

Screening for colorectal cancer: established and emerging modalities

Nikhil Pawa et al. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. .

Abstract

It has been estimated that >95% of cases of colorectal cancer (CRC) would benefit from curative surgery if diagnosis was made at an early or premalignant polyp stage of disease. Over the past 10 years, most developed nation states have implemented mass population screening programs, which are typically targeted at the older (at-risk) age group (>50-60 years old). Conventional screening largely relies on periodic patient-centric investigation, particularly involving colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy, or else on the fecal occult blood test. These methods are compromised by either low cost-effectiveness or limited diagnostic accuracy. Advances in the development of diagnostic molecular markers for CRC have yielded an expanding list of potential new screening modalities based on investigations of patient stool (for colonocyte DNA mutations, epigenetic changes or microRNA expression) or blood specimens (for plasma DNA mutations, epigenetic changes, heteroplasmic mitochondrial DNA mutations, leukocyte transcriptome profile, plasma microRNA expression or protein and autoantibody expression). In this Review, we present a critical evaluation of the performance data and relative merits of these various new potential methods. None of these molecular diagnostic methods have yet been evaluated beyond the proof-of-principle and pilot-scale study stage and it could be some years before they replace existing methods for population screening in CRC.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jul;105(7):1627-32 - PubMed
    1. Respir Res. 2010 Feb 10;11:18 - PubMed
    1. Br J Cancer. 2011 Mar 15;104(6):893-8 - PubMed
    1. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Dec;103(12):3142-8 - PubMed
    1. Clin Chem. 2002 Aug;48(8):1296-304 - PubMed