The self-administered patient satisfaction scale for primary hip and knee arthroplasty
- PMID: 22046521
- PMCID: PMC3199955
- DOI: 10.1155/2011/591253
The self-administered patient satisfaction scale for primary hip and knee arthroplasty
Abstract
Introduction. The objective of this study was to develop a short self-report questionnaire for evaluating patient satisfaction with the outcome of hip and knee replacement surgery. Methods. This scale consists of four items focusing on satisfaction with the extent of pain relief, improvement in ability to perform home or yard work, ability to perform recreational activities, and overall satisfaction with joint replacement. This instrument does not measure satisfaction with process of care. The responses are scored on a Likert scale, with the total score ranging from 25 to 100 per question. The instrument was tested on 1700 patients undergoing primary total hip and total knee replacement surgery, evaluated preoperatively, at 12 weeks, and one year postoperatively. Psychometric testing included internal consistency, measured with Cronbach's alpha, and convergent validity, measured by correlation with changes in measures of health status between the preoperative, 12-week, and one-year evaluations. Results. The internal consistency (reliability) of the scale, measured by the Cronbach's alpha, ranged from 0.86 to 0.92. The scale demonstrated substantial ceiling effects at 1 year. The scale scores correlated modestly with the absolute SF-36 PCS and WOMAC scores (ρ = 0.56-0.63 and also with the WOMAC change scores (ρ = 0.38-0.46) at both 12-week and 1-year followups. Conclusions. This instrument is valid and reliable for measuring patient satisfaction following primary hip and knee arthroplasty and could be further evaluated for use with other musculoskeletal interventions.
Figures
Comment in
-
Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries Report of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries Part II. Recommendations for selection, administration, and analysis.Acta Orthop. 2016 Jul;87 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):9-23. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1181816. Epub 2016 May 26. Acta Orthop. 2016. PMID: 27228230 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ross CK, Steward CA, Sinacore JM. A comparative study of seven measures of patient satisfaction. Medical Care. 1995;33(4):392–406. - PubMed
-
- Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J, Gregg PJ. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. Data from the national joint registry for England and Wales. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery B. 2007;89(7):893–900. - PubMed
-
- Janse AJ, Gemke RJBJ, Uiterwaal CSPM, Van Der Tweel I, Kimpen JLL, Sinnema G. Quality of life: patients and doctors don’t always agree: a meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2004;57(7):653–661. - PubMed
-
- Brokelman RBG, van Loon CJM, Rijnberg WJ. Patient versus surgeon satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery B. 2003;85(4):495–498. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources