Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011:2011:591253.
doi: 10.1155/2011/591253. Epub 2011 Jan 10.

The self-administered patient satisfaction scale for primary hip and knee arthroplasty

Affiliations

The self-administered patient satisfaction scale for primary hip and knee arthroplasty

N Mahomed et al. Arthritis. 2011.

Abstract

Introduction. The objective of this study was to develop a short self-report questionnaire for evaluating patient satisfaction with the outcome of hip and knee replacement surgery. Methods. This scale consists of four items focusing on satisfaction with the extent of pain relief, improvement in ability to perform home or yard work, ability to perform recreational activities, and overall satisfaction with joint replacement. This instrument does not measure satisfaction with process of care. The responses are scored on a Likert scale, with the total score ranging from 25 to 100 per question. The instrument was tested on 1700 patients undergoing primary total hip and total knee replacement surgery, evaluated preoperatively, at 12 weeks, and one year postoperatively. Psychometric testing included internal consistency, measured with Cronbach's alpha, and convergent validity, measured by correlation with changes in measures of health status between the preoperative, 12-week, and one-year evaluations. Results. The internal consistency (reliability) of the scale, measured by the Cronbach's alpha, ranged from 0.86 to 0.92. The scale demonstrated substantial ceiling effects at 1 year. The scale scores correlated modestly with the absolute SF-36 PCS and WOMAC scores (ρ = 0.56-0.63 and also with the WOMAC change scores (ρ = 0.38-0.46) at both 12-week and 1-year followups. Conclusions. This instrument is valid and reliable for measuring patient satisfaction following primary hip and knee arthroplasty and could be further evaluated for use with other musculoskeletal interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean 1-year total WOMAC scores (with SD) compared across quartiles of 1-year satisfaction scores for hip patients.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean 1-year total WOMAC scores (with SD) compared across quartiles of 1-year satisfaction scores for knee patients.

Comment in

References

    1. Ross CK, Steward CA, Sinacore JM. A comparative study of seven measures of patient satisfaction. Medical Care. 1995;33(4):392–406. - PubMed
    1. Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J, Gregg PJ. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. Data from the national joint registry for England and Wales. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery B. 2007;89(7):893–900. - PubMed
    1. Janse AJ, Gemke RJBJ, Uiterwaal CSPM, Van Der Tweel I, Kimpen JLL, Sinnema G. Quality of life: patients and doctors don’t always agree: a meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2004;57(7):653–661. - PubMed
    1. Rothwell PM, McDowell Z, Wong CK, Dorman PJ. Doctors and patients don’t agree: cross sectional study of patients’ and doctors’ perceptions and assessments of disability in multiple sclerosis. British Medical Journal. 1997;314(7094):1580–1583. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brokelman RBG, van Loon CJM, Rijnberg WJ. Patient versus surgeon satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery B. 2003;85(4):495–498. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources