Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Aug;103(8):746-53.
doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30414-4.

Barriers to colorectal cancer screening among publicly insured urban women: no knowledge of tests and no clinician recommendation

Affiliations

Barriers to colorectal cancer screening among publicly insured urban women: no knowledge of tests and no clinician recommendation

Christina M Robinson et al. J Natl Med Assoc. 2011 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess barriers to colorectal cancer screening among urban publicly insured women and to evaluate how barriers among underscreened urban women have changed between 2001 and 2007-2008.

Methods: Eligible women were selected using Medicaid Managed Care Organization (MMCO) administrative data. MMCO outreach staff interviewed women by phone between October 2007 and February 2008, and assessed their barriers to colorectal cancer screening. We compared the results of these interviews with interviews conducted in 2001 with women in community health center waiting rooms.

Results: Thirty percent of overdue women had never heard of either colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy, and 55% had never heard of home fecal occult blood testing (FOBT). Among overdue women who had heard of colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy, 33% reported misconceptions and 28% reported worry as a barrier. No clinician recommendation was the most commonly reported barrier to home FOBT (44%) and was also reported as a barrier to endoscopy by 22% of women. Between 2001 and 2007-2008, the proportion of women reporting that they had not received a clinician's recommendation for endoscopy or home FOBT increased significantly.

Conclusions: A lack of information, no clinician recommendation, misconceptions, and worry persist as barriers to colon cancer screening among this underscreened urban population. An increased focus on clinician recommendation and patient education about stool-based as well as endoscopic screening methods could lead to greater screening compliance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Eligible Female Medicaid Managed-Care Members Reached, Not Reached, and Interviewed, 2007-2008

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Steinwachs D, Allen JD, Barlow WE, et al. National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: Enhancing use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(10):663–667. - PubMed
    1. Holden DJ, Jonas DE, Porterfield DS, et al. Systematic review: enhancing the use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(10):668–676. - PubMed
    1. Klabunde CN. Trends in the Use and Quality of Colorectal Cancer Screening in the US NIH State of the Science Conference. Bethesda, MD: 2010.
    1. Shavers VL, Jackson MC, Sheppard VB. Racial/ethnic patterns of uptake of colorectal screening, National Health Interview Survey 2000-2008. J Natl Med Assoc. 2010;102(7):621–635. - PubMed
    1. Soneji S, Iyer SS, Armstrong K, et al. Racial disparities in stage-specific colorectal cancer mortality: 1960-2005. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(10):1912–1916. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types