Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Apr;250(4):499-505.
doi: 10.1007/s00417-011-1851-1. Epub 2011 Nov 3.

Endophthalmitis following intravitreal injections

Affiliations

Endophthalmitis following intravitreal injections

Cristina Irigoyen et al. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 Apr.

Abstract

Background: To report the clinical features, culture results, management and visual outcome of patients with endophthalmitis following intravitreal injections.

Methods: Retrospective review of all patients with suspected endophthalmitis after intravitreal injections treated with intravitreal antibiotics (teicoplanin and ciprofloxacin) at a referral centre between January 2003 and December 2010.

Results: Nineteen cases that had aqueous or vitreous biopsy were identified. Nine had negative culture. Ten had positive culture; Staphylococcus species in 4/10, Streptococcus species in 4/10, E. coli in 1/10 and gram-negative bacilli in 1/10. Symptoms developed within the first 48 hours in all. One of ten culture-positive cases had no pain on presentation, while 5/9 patients with negative culture reported pain. Initial treatment consisted of intravitreal antibiotics in all cases, 6/19 cases required a second intravitreal antibiotic injection, 4/19 underwent vitrectomy as secondary therapy. At the last follow up, 7/19 patients had visual acuity of 6/18 or better, 9/19 had visual acuity of 6/60 or worse.

Conclusion: The overall numbers of patients with endophthalmitis following intravitreal injections has risen dramatically over the past years. In contrast to earlier reports of multicentre studies, outcome of patients is relatively poor in the current treatment settings. We did not find clinical features useful in identifying cases with negative culture.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008 Apr;92(4):518-22 - PubMed
    1. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2009 Sep;10(13):2119-26 - PubMed
    1. Retina. 2011 Apr;31(4):662-8 - PubMed
    1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995 Dec;113(12):1479-96 - PubMed
    1. Eye (Lond). 2008 Apr;22(4):590-1 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources