Categorizing natural objects: a comparison of the visual and the haptic modalities
- PMID: 22048319
- DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2916-4
Categorizing natural objects: a comparison of the visual and the haptic modalities
Abstract
Although the hands are the most important tool for humans to manipulate objects, only little is known about haptic processing of natural objects. Here, we selected a unique set of natural objects, namely seashells, which vary along a variety of object features, while others are shared across all stimuli. To correctly interact with objects, they have to be identified or categorized. For both processes, measuring similarities between objects is crucial. Our goal is to better understand the haptic similarity percept by comparing it to the visual similarity percept. First, direct similarity measures were analyzed using multidimensional scaling techniques to visualize the perceptual spaces of both modalities. We find that the visual and the haptic modality form almost identical perceptual spaces. Next, we performed three different categorization tasks. All tasks exhibit a highly accurate processing of complex shapes of the haptic modality. Moreover, we find that objects grouped into the same category form regions within the perceptual space. Hence, in both modalities, perceived similarity constitutes the basis for categorizing objects. Moreover, both modalities focus on shape to form categories. Taken together, our results lead to the assumption that the same cognitive processes link haptic and visual similarity perception and the resulting categorization behavior.
Similar articles
-
Solid shape discrimination from vision and haptics: natural objects (Capsicum annuum) and Gibson's "feelies".Exp Brain Res. 2012 Oct;222(3):321-32. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3220-7. Epub 2012 Aug 25. Exp Brain Res. 2012. PMID: 22918607
-
Similarity and categorization: from vision to touch.Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Sep;138(1):219-30. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.06.007. Epub 2011 Jul 14. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011. PMID: 21752344
-
Multimodal similarity and categorization of novel, three-dimensional objects.Neuropsychologia. 2007 Feb 1;45(3):484-95. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.02.009. Epub 2006 Mar 31. Neuropsychologia. 2007. PMID: 16580027 Clinical Trial.
-
A putative model of multisensory object representation.Brain Topogr. 2009 May;21(3-4):269-74. doi: 10.1007/s10548-009-0087-4. Epub 2009 Mar 28. Brain Topogr. 2009. PMID: 19330441 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The experience of force: the role of haptic experience of forces in visual perception of object motion and interactions, mental simulation, and motion-related judgments.Psychol Bull. 2012 Jul;138(4):589-615. doi: 10.1037/a0025587. Psychol Bull. 2012. PMID: 22730922 Review.
Cited by
-
Haptic object recognition based on shape relates to visual object recognition ability.Psychol Res. 2022 Jun;86(4):1262-1273. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01560-z. Epub 2021 Aug 5. Psychol Res. 2022. PMID: 34355269 Free PMC article.
-
Solid shape discrimination from vision and haptics: natural objects (Capsicum annuum) and Gibson's "feelies".Exp Brain Res. 2012 Oct;222(3):321-32. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3220-7. Epub 2012 Aug 25. Exp Brain Res. 2012. PMID: 22918607
-
Multisensory Part-based Representations of Objects in Human Lateral Occipital Cortex.J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Jun;28(6):869-81. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00937. Epub 2016 Feb 26. J Cogn Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 26918587 Free PMC article.
-
Memory representations in a cross-modal matching task: evidence for a verbal component.Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 23;14:1253085. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1253085. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 38078216 Free PMC article.
-
Physicochemical features partially explain olfactory crossmodal correspondences.Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 30;13(1):10590. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37770-1. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37391587 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources