Which of satellite- or model-based estimates is closer to reality for aerosol indirect forcing?
- PMID: 22052880
- PMCID: PMC3219127
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1114634108
Which of satellite- or model-based estimates is closer to reality for aerosol indirect forcing?
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Comment on
-
Satellite methods underestimate indirect climate forcing by aerosols.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 16;108(33):13404-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1018526108. Epub 2011 Aug 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011. PMID: 21808047 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Quaas J, Boucher O, Bellouin N, Kinne S. Satellite-based estimate of the direct and indirect aerosol climate forcing. J Geophys Res. 2008;113(D05204) 10.1029/2007JD008962.
-
- Lohmann U, Lesins G. Stronger constraints on the anthropogenic indirect aerosol effect. Science. 2002;298:1012–1015. - PubMed
-
- Quaas J, Boucher O, Lohmann U. Constraining the total aerosol indirect effect in the LMDZ and ECHAM4 GCMs using MODIS satellite data. Atmos Chem Phys. 2006;6:947–955.
-
- Andreae MO. Correlation between cloud condensation nuclei concentration and aerosol optical thickness in remote and polluted regions. Atmos Chem Phys. 2009;9:543–556.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
