Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Nov 1:2:268.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00268. eCollection 2011.

Feature integration across the lifespan: stickier stimulus-response bindings in children and older adults

Affiliations

Feature integration across the lifespan: stickier stimulus-response bindings in children and older adults

Bernhard Hommel et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Humans integrate the features of perceived events and of action plans into episodic event files. Here we investigated whether children (9-10 years), younger adults (20-31 years), and older adults (64-76 years) differ in the flexibility of managing (updating) event files. Relative to young adults, performance in children and older adults was more hampered by partial mismatches between present and previous stimulus-response relations, suggesting less efficient updating of episodic stimulus-response representations in childhood and old age. Results are discussed in relation to changes in cortical neurochemistry during maturation and senescence.

Keywords: aging; attention; development; feature binding; integration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sequence of events. After a “blank” interval in which only a grid was visible, three left- or right-pointing arrows (R1 cue) indicated which key was to be pressed for R1. After another “blank” interval, the letter X or O appeared in the top or bottom box of the grid (S1). Shape and location of this stimulus were irrelevant; participants were simply to carry out the previously signaled response (R1) upon presentation of S1. After another “blank” interval, the letter X or O appeared in the top or bottom box of the grid (S2). The shape of this stimulus signaled R2, which was to be carried out immediately. The example shows an “alternation” of stimulus shape and location.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Reaction times and percentage of errors for R2, as a function of age group and the repetition vs. alternation of stimulus location and stimulus shape.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Reaction times and percentage of errors for R2, as a function of age group and the repetition vs. alternation of stimulus shape and response (left panel) and the repetition vs. alternation of stimulus location and response (right panel).

References

    1. Bäckman L., Nyberg L., Lindenberger U., Li S. C., Farde L. (2006). The correlative triad among aging, dopamine, and cognition: current status and future projects. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 30, 791–80710.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.06.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buckner R. L. (2003). Functional-anatomic correlates of control processes in memory. J. Neurosci. 23, 3999–4004 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chalfonte B. L., Johnson M. K. (1996). Feature memory and binding in young and older adults. Mem. Cognit. 24, 403–41610.3758/BF03200930 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Colzato L. S., Erasmus V., Hommel B. (2004). Moderate alcohol consumption in humans impairs feature binding in visual perception. Neurosci. Lett. 360, 103–10510.1016/j.neulet.2004.01.054 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Colzato L. S., Fagioli S., Erasmus V., Hommel B. (2005). Caffeine, but not nicotine enhances visual feature binding. Eur. J. Neurosci. 21, 591–59510.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.03868.x - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources