Comparison of range of commercial or primary care led weight reduction programmes with minimal intervention control for weight loss in obesity: lighten Up randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 22053315
- PMCID: PMC3208022
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d6500
Comparison of range of commercial or primary care led weight reduction programmes with minimal intervention control for weight loss in obesity: lighten Up randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Objective: To assess the effectiveness of a range of weight management programmes in terms of weight loss.
Design: Eight arm randomised controlled trial.
Setting: Primary care trust in Birmingham, England.
Participants: 740 obese or overweight men and women with a comorbid disorder identified from general practice records.
Interventions: Weight loss programmes of 12 weeks' duration: Weight Watchers; Slimming World; Rosemary Conley; group based, dietetics led programme; general practice one to one counselling; pharmacy led one to one counselling; choice of any of the six programmes. The comparator group was provided with 12 vouchers enabling free entrance to a local leisure (fitness) centre.
Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was weight loss at programme end (12 weeks). Secondary outcomes were weight loss at one year, self reported physical activity, and percentage weight loss at programme end and one year.
Results: Follow-up data were available for 658 (88.9%) participants at programme end and 522 (70.5%) at one year. All programmes achieved significant weight loss from baseline to programme end (range 1.37 kg (general practice) to 4.43 kg (Weight Watchers)), and all except general practice and pharmacy provision resulted in significant weight loss at one year. At one year, only the Weight Watchers group had significantly greater weight loss than did the comparator group (2.5 (95% confidence interval 0.8 to 4.2) kg greater loss,). The commercial programmes achieved significantly greater weight loss than did the primary care programmes at programme end (mean difference 2.3 (1.3 to 3.4) kg). The primary care programmes were the most costly to provide. Participants allocated to the choice arm did not have better outcomes than those randomly allocated to a programme.
Conclusions: Commercially provided weight management services are more effective and cheaper than primary care based services led by specially trained staff, which are ineffective. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN25072883.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at
Figures
Comment in
-
What makes a weight loss programme successful?BMJ. 2011 Nov 3;343:d6629. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6629. BMJ. 2011. PMID: 22053316 No abstract available.
-
Overweight and obese individuals following either commercial or primary care-led weight loss programmes achieve significant weight loss at the end of the 12-week programme, but only the commercial programmes studied had sustained effect to 1 year.Evid Based Med. 2012 Oct;17(5):147-8. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2011-100478. Epub 2012 Jan 31. Evid Based Med. 2012. PMID: 22293336 No abstract available.
References
-
- World Health Organization. Obesity. 2011. www.euro.who.int/en/what-we-do/health-topics/noncommunicable-diseases/ob....
-
- Kopelman P. Health risks associated with overweight and obesity. Obes Rev 2007;8(suppl 1):13-7. - PubMed
-
- Craig R. Physical activity and fitness: summary of key findings. In: Mindell J, Hirani V, eds. Health Survey for England 2008. NHS Information Centre, 2009.
-
- National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Obesity: guidance on the prevention, identification, assessment and management of overweight and obesity in adults and children. NICE, 2006 (clinical guideline 43). - PubMed
-
- Heshka S, Anderson JW, Atkinson RL. Weight loss with self-help compared with a structured commercial program: a randomized trial. JAMA 2003;289:1792-8. - PubMed