Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 May;14(5):578-85.
doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntr256. Epub 2011 Nov 4.

Front-loaded versus weekly counseling for treatment of tobacco addiction

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Front-loaded versus weekly counseling for treatment of tobacco addiction

Arthur J Garvey et al. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012 May.

Abstract

Introduction: Approximately 60%-70% of cigarette smokers who try to quit relapse by 2 weeks postcessation. We tested the efficacy of a front-loaded (FL) counseling intervention whose goal was to increase the likelihood of successful early abstinence and subsequent long-term abstinence.

Methods: We randomized 278 adult smokers to an FL or weekly behavioral smoking cessation counseling schedule. The total number of sessions across treatment was the same for both groups. However, those assigned to the FL schedule received 6 counseling sessions in the first 2 weeks postcessation, while those in the weekly condition received 2 sessions. Participants in both groups also received standard nicotine patch treatment.

Results: At 1 year postcessation, FL participants were significantly less likely to have relapsed when continuous abstinence was used as the definition of abstinence/relapse (11.7% abstinent vs. 6.3%, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.69, p = .007); and there were nonsignificant trends for FL subjects to have better outcomes when abstinence was defined as never smoking for 7 or more consecutive days nor for 7 or more consecutive episodes (18.4% abstinent vs. 14.8%, HR = 0.83, p = .20) and as point prevalence abstinence (15.6% abstinent vs. 12.9%, p = .11). The relationship between FL counseling treatment and continuous abstinence was partially mediated by higher postcessation levels of social support perceived from counseling and greater use of cessation-related coping strategies.

Conclusions: We conclude that FL counseling is a promising treatment model that should be evaluated further, perhaps using modifications of the FL schedule used in this study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Participation flow diagram. CPD indicates cigarettes per day, HTN indicates hypertension, and TQD is target quit day.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Survival distribution function by treatment condition where survival is defined based on the continuous abstinence definition of abstinence/relapse (p = .007 from Cox regression).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Survival distribution function by treatment condition where survival is defined based on the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) definition of abstinence/relapse. NHLBI abstinence is defined as never smoking for more than seven consecutive days nor for more than seven consecutive episodes (Ossip-Klein et al., 1986; p = .20 from Cox regression).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Percent abstinent by treatment group across 1 year of follow-up using point prevalence abstinence as the dependent variable (p = .11 from generalized estimating equations analysis).

References

    1. Anda RF, Williamson DF, Escobedo LG. Depression and the dynamics of smoking: A national perspective. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1990;264:1541–1545. doi:10.1001/jama.264.12.1541. - PubMed
    1. Baron RH, Kenny DA. The moderation-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986;51:1173–1182. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173. - PubMed
    1. Fiore MC, Jaen CR, Baker TB, Bailey WC, Benowitz NL, Curry SJ, et al. Treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update. Clinical practice guideline. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service; 2008.
    1. Garvey AJ, Kinnunen T, Nordstrom BL, Utman CH, Doherty K, Rosner B. Effects of nicotine gum dose by level of nicotine dependence. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2000;2:53–63. doi:10.1080/14622200050011303. - PubMed
    1. Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerstrom KO. The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence: A revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. British Journal of Addiction. 1991;86:1119–1127. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x. - PubMed

Publication types