Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;19(1-2):13-34.
doi: 10.1080/13825585.2011.622740. Epub 2011 Nov 8.

Mood, motivation, and misinformation: aging and affective state influences on memory

Affiliations

Mood, motivation, and misinformation: aging and affective state influences on memory

Thomas M Hess et al. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2012.

Abstract

Normative age differences in memory have typically been attributed to declines in basic cognitive and cortical mechanisms. The present study examined the degree to which dominant everyday affect might also be associated with age-related memory errors using the misinformation paradigm. Younger and older adults viewed a positive and a negative event, and then were exposed to misinformation about each event. Older adults exhibited a higher likelihood than young adults of falsely identifying misinformation as having occurred in the events. Consistent with expectations, strength of the misinformation effect was positively associated with dominant mood, and controlling for mood eliminated any age effects. Also, motivation to engage in complex cognitive activity was negatively associated with susceptibility to misinformation, and susceptibility was stronger for negative than for positive events. We argue that motivational processes underlie all of the observed effects, and that such processes are useful in understanding age differences in memory performance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean misinformation effects adjusted for ability covariate.

References

    1. Adams C. Qualitative age differences in memory for text: A life-span developmental perspective. Psychology and Aging. 1991;6:323–336. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.6.3.323. - PubMed
    1. Bohanek JG, Fivush R, Walker E. Memories of positive and negative emotional events. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2005;19:51–66. doi: 10.1002/acp.1064.
    1. Cacioppo JT, Petty RE, Kao CF. The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1984;48:306–307. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13. - PubMed
    1. Cacioppo JT, Petty RE, Feinstein JA, Jarvis WBG. Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin. 1996;119:197–253. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197.
    1. Carstensen LL, Isaacowitz DM, Charles ST. Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist. 1999;54:165–181. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.165. - PubMed

Publication types