Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1991;29(4):323-34.
doi: 10.1016/0309-1740(91)90011-E.

Stunning and shackling influences on quality of porcine Longissimus dorsi and Semimembranosus muscles

Affiliations

Stunning and shackling influences on quality of porcine Longissimus dorsi and Semimembranosus muscles

J L Aalhus et al. Meat Sci. 1991.

Abstract

Seventy-one barrows of three porcine genotypes (nn, Nn and NN genotypes with respect to halothane) were electrically stunned on the right side and randomly assigned to one of three treatments during the bleeding process (prone, PR; shackled left, SL; or shackled right, SR) to investigate the influence of both shackling and stunning on ultimate meat quality. PR carcasses had less side-to-side variation in 40 min pH than either SL or SR carcasses. Shackling contributed to a decreased 40 min pH in the semimembranosus (SM) and posterior longissimus dorsi (PL). The effects of stunning appeared to be additive when combined with shackling, tending to lower pH in the mid-longissimus dorsi (ML; P <- 0·10). The 'free' side of the shackled carcass also had significantly lower 40 min pH in the ML, PL and SM locations when compared to PR sides. Genotype had no influence on shackling since there was no treatment by genotype interactions. Despite significant effects on post-mortem metabolism (indicated by the differences in 40 min pH) shackling alone had little influence on overall ultimate meat quality of the carcass. Depending on the sampling location, soluble protein and L (∗) and b (∗) values varied among treatments. Shear force and a (∗) values were similar among treatments, but PR and SL carcasses had significantly lower expressible juice and drip loss compared to SR carcasses. These results suggest that, although shackling alone has little effect on meat quality, in combination with electrical stunning, shackling can lead to a decrease in meat quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

LinkOut - more resources