Sensory properties and preferences
- PMID: 22061453
- DOI: 10.1016/0309-1740(94)90034-5
Sensory properties and preferences
Abstract
Common mistakes are frequent in sensory evaluation of meats and meat products. Conceptual confusion is often observed in triangular tests when add-on questions are included in the testing procedures, and when descriptive and hedonic scales are mixed in profiling exercises. Similar consumer responses are often recorded from trained, and thus biased, panels. Preference for meats seems to be most strongly affected by changes in colour/appearance and texture, and to a lesser extent by changes in flavour (that is when off-flavours are not present). It is difficult to generalise as to whether appearance/colour attributes or texture attributes are the most important. A simplified model for texture understanding is suggested, where water/fat perception and structure perception (described by juiciness and tenderness) are orthogonal phenomena and where most other textural attributes can be explained by this structure.
Copyright © 1993. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Similar articles
-
The impact of sensory quality of pork on consumer preference.Meat Sci. 2007 May;76(1):61-73. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.10.014. Epub 2007 Jan 25. Meat Sci. 2007. PMID: 22064192
-
Sensory and instrumental analysis of longitudinal and transverse textural variation in pork longissimus dorsi.Meat Sci. 2004 Dec;68(4):611-29. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.05.013. Meat Sci. 2004. PMID: 22062538
-
Optimizing the sensory characteristics and acceptance of canned cat food: use of a human taste panel.J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2009 Feb;93(1):52-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2007.00778.x. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2009. PMID: 19386008
-
Colloidal aspects of texture perception.Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2009 Aug 30;150(1):27-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2009.04.002. Epub 2009 Apr 24. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2009. PMID: 19457463 Review.
-
Materials Properties, Oral Processing, and Sensory Analysis of Eating Meat and Meat Analogs.Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2022 Mar 25;13:193-215. doi: 10.1146/annurev-food-090821-032332. Epub 2021 Nov 16. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2022. PMID: 34784489 Review.
Cited by
-
Determination of Optimal Harvest Weight for Mangalica Pigs Using a Serial Harvest Approach to Measure Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics.Foods. 2022 Dec 7;11(24):3958. doi: 10.3390/foods11243958. Foods. 2022. PMID: 36553699 Free PMC article.
-
Characterization of Growth Performance, Pork Quality, and Body Composition in Mangalica Pigs.Foods. 2023 Jan 26;12(3):554. doi: 10.3390/foods12030554. Foods. 2023. PMID: 36766083 Free PMC article.
-
Sampling Adipose and Muscle Tissue following Post-Harvest Scalding Does Not Affect RNA Integrity or Real-Time PCR Results in Market Weight Yorkshire Pigs.Foods. 2022 Jun 14;11(12):1741. doi: 10.3390/foods11121741. Foods. 2022. PMID: 35741939 Free PMC article.
-
The Effects of Production System and Sex on the Sensory Quality Characteristics of Dorper Lamb.Foods. 2020 Jun 2;9(6):725. doi: 10.3390/foods9060725. Foods. 2020. PMID: 32498421 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison and correlation analysis of different Swine breeds meat quality.Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2013 Jul;26(7):905-10. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2012.12622. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2013. PMID: 25049866 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources