Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Dec;68(12):1238-46.
doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.121. Epub 2011 Nov 7.

Adjunctive counseling during brief and extended buprenorphine-naloxone treatment for prescription opioid dependence: a 2-phase randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Adjunctive counseling during brief and extended buprenorphine-naloxone treatment for prescription opioid dependence: a 2-phase randomized controlled trial

Roger D Weiss et al. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Context: No randomized trials have examined treatments for prescription opioid dependence, despite its increasing prevalence.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of brief and extended buprenorphine hydrochloride-naloxone hydrochloride treatment, with different counseling intensities, for patients dependent on prescription opioids.

Design: Multisite, randomized clinical trial using a 2-phase adaptive treatment research design. Brief treatment (phase 1) included 2-week buprenorphine-naloxone stabilization, 2-week taper, and 8-week postmedication follow-up. Patients with successful opioid use outcomes exited the study; unsuccessful patients entered phase 2: extended (12-week) buprenorphine-naloxone treatment, 4-week taper, and 8-week postmedication follow-up.

Setting: Ten US sites. Patients A total of 653 treatment-seeking outpatients dependent on prescription opioids.

Interventions: In both phases, patients were randomized to standard medical management (SMM) or SMM plus opioid dependence counseling; all received buprenorphine-naloxone.

Main outcome measures: Predefined "successful outcome" in each phase: composite measures indicating minimal or no opioid use based on urine test-confirmed self-reports.

Results: During phase 1, only 6.6% (43 of 653) of patients had successful outcomes, with no difference between SMM and SMM plus opioid dependence counseling. In contrast, 49.2% (177 of 360) attained successful outcomes in phase 2 during extended buprenorphine-naloxone treatment (week 12), with no difference between counseling conditions. Success rates 8 weeks after completing the buprenorphine-naloxone taper (phase 2, week 24) dropped to 8.6% (31 of 360), again with no counseling difference. In secondary analyses, successful phase 2 outcomes were more common while taking buprenorphine-naloxone than 8 weeks after taper (49.2% [177 of 360] vs 8.6% [31 of 360], P < .001). Chronic pain did not affect opioid use outcomes; a history of ever using heroin was associated with lower phase 2 success rates while taking buprenorphine-naloxone.

Conclusions: Prescription opioid-dependent patients are most likely to reduce opioid use during buprenorphine-naloxone treatment; if tapered off buprenorphine-naloxone, even after 12 weeks of treatment, the likelihood of an unsuccessful outcome is high, even in patients receiving counseling in addition to SMM.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00316277.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study Design 1Stratified by presence or absence of a history of heroin use and current chronic pain 2Standard Medical Management; phase 1, week 1: 2 visits; weeks 2 to 4: 1 visit/wk; and weeks 5 to 8: biweekly visits 3Opioid dependence counseling (ODC); phase 1, Weeks 1 to 4: 2 visits/wk: Weeks 5 to 8: biweekly visits 4Buprenorphine-naloxone (bup/nx) dose; 8 to 32 mg/d 5Phase 1 primary endpoint: completion of week 12 with self-reported opioid use on no more than 4 days in a month; absence of 2 consecutive opioid-positive urine test results; no additional substance use disorder treatment (other than self-help); and no more than 1 missing urine sample 6Stratified by phase 1 counseling condition, that is, SMM or SMM+ODC 7SMM; phase 2. week 1: 2 visits; and weeks 2 to 16: 1 visit/wk 8ODC; phase 2, Weeks 1 to 6; 2 visits/wk; and weeks 7 to 12: 1 visit/wk 9Phase 2 primary endpoint: abstinent from opioids during week 12 (the final week of bu/nx stabilization) and during at least 2 of the previous 3 weeks (weeks 9–11) 10Phase 2 secondary endpoint: abstinent from opioids during week 24 and during at least 2 of the previous 3 weeks (weeks 21–23)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Randomization, Treatment, and Follow-up of Study Patients *Reasons (n = 315) for not meeting Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria: not physically dependent on opioids (n = 47); unable to meet study requirements (n = 39); psychotic or psychiatrically unstable (n = 34); not in good general health (n = 32); did not meet DSM-IV criteria for current opioid dependence (n = 32); medical condition made participation medically hazardous (n = 25); no medical clearance from treating physician prescribing opioids (n = 23); traumatic or major pain event (n = 18); heroin use more than 4 days in the past 30 days (n = 18); history of opioid use as a result of heroin use (n = 17); (10) dependent on alcohol, sedative-hypnotics or stimulants (n = 10); required ongoing pain management (n = 10); participated in methadone treatment/methadone dose greater than 40 mg (n = 4); pending surgery (n = 3); and liver function test results 5 times the upper limit of normal (n = 3). A participant could be represented in more than one category of the reasons for non-eligibility; 5 patients who did not meet all inclusion criteria were randomized. ODC indicates opioid dependence counseling; and SMM, standard medical management.

References

    1. Executive Office of the President of the United States Office of National Drug Control Policy. Epidemic: Responding to America’s Prescription Drug Abuse Crisis. 2011.
    1. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Office of Applied Studies. The NSDUH Report: Trends in Nonmedical Use of Prescription Pain Relievers: 2002 to 2007. Rockville, MD: Feb 5, 2009.
    1. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 23. Vol. 59. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Jun 18, 2010. Emergency department visits involving nonmedical use of selected prescription drugs -United States, 2004–2008; pp. 705–709. - PubMed
    1. The TEDS Report: Substance Abuse Treatment Admissions Involving Abuse of Pain Relievers: 1998 and 2008. Rockville, MD: Jul 15, 2010. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Office of Applied Studies.
    1. Paulozzi LJ, Budnitz DS, Xi Y. Increasing deaths from opioid analgesics in the United States. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2006 Sep;15(9):618–627. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data