Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Dec;40(8):486-91.
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/64452475.

Comparison of ultrasonography with computed tomography in the diagnosis of nasal bone fractures

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of ultrasonography with computed tomography in the diagnosis of nasal bone fractures

R Javadrashid et al. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare ultrasonography with CT in the diagnosis of nasal bone fractures.

Methods: 40 patients (9 female and 31 male) with mid-facial fractures, which were suspected nasal bone fractures, were included. All of the patients had mid-facial CT images. Ultrasonography with a 7.5 MHz transducer (Aloka 3500, Tokyo, Japan) was used to evaluate the nasal bone fractures. All of the sonograms were compared with CT findings for sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. A χ(2) test was applied to the data to assess statistical significance.

Results: CT diagnosed nasal bone fractures in 24 of the 40 patients (9 unilateral fractures and 15 bilateral fractures) while ultrasonography diagnosed the fractured bones in 23 patients (9 unilateral fractures and 14 bilateral fractures). Ultrasonography missed one fractured bone in a bilateral fractured case and a unilateral fracture was also missed (two false-negative results). The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography in assessing nasal bone fracture in comparison with CT were 94.9% and 100%, respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) and the negative predictive value (NPV) of ultrasonographic evaluation of the nasal bone fractures were 100% and 95.3%, respectively. The χ(2) test did not show any significant difference between CT and ultrasonography in diagnosis of nasal bone fractures (P = 0.819).

Conclusion: Ultrasonography can be used as a first line of diagnostic imaging for evaluating nasal bone fractures, especially in children and pregnant women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This work was supported by a grant from the research deputy of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a–c) The positions of the patient and ultrasound probe
Figure 2
Figure 2
A 40-year-old woman with unilateral nasal bone fracture (white arrows). (a) CT view and (b) sonogram which detected the nasal bone fracture
Figure 3
Figure 3
A 25-year-old man with a left nasal bone fracture (white arrow). (a) CT view and (b) sonogram which did not show the left nasal bone fracture
Figure 4
Figure 4
A 28-year-old man without nasal bone fracture. (a) CT view and (b) sonogram view

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fonseca RJ, Walker RV, Betts NJ, Barber HD. Nasal fractures. Indresano AT, Beckley ML, (eds). Oral and maxillofacial trauma. St. Louis, MO: Saunders, 2005, pp 737–741
    1. Thiede O, Krömer JH, Rudack C, Stoll W, Osada N, Schmäl F. Comparison of ultrasonography and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of nasal fractures. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;131:434–439 - PubMed
    1. Hong HS, Cha JG, Paik SH, Park SJ, Park JS, Kim DH. High-resolution sonography for nasal fracture in children. Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:86–92 - PubMed
    1. Nigam A, Goni A, Benjamin A, Dasgupta AR. The value of radiographs in the management of the fractured nose. Arch Emerg Med 1993;10:293–297 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Logan MO, Driscoll K, Masterson J. The utility of nasal bone radiographs in nasal trauma. Clin Radiol 1994;49:192–194 - PubMed

Publication types