Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jan;67(1):12-18.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06896.x. Epub 2011 Nov 9.

A validation study of the CEMACH recommended modified early obstetric warning system (MEOWS)

S Singh  1 , A McGlennan  2 , A England  2 , R Simons  2
Affiliations
Free article

A validation study of the CEMACH recommended modified early obstetric warning system (MEOWS)

S Singh et al. Anaesthesia. 2012 Jan.
Free article

Erratum in

  • Anaesthesia. 2012 Apr;67(4):453

Abstract

The 2003-2005 Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health report recommended the introduction of the modified early obstetric warning system (MEOWS) in all obstetric inpatients to track maternal physiological parameters, and to aid early recognition and treatment of the acutely unwell parturient. We prospectively reviewed 676 consecutive obstetric admissions, looking at their completed MEOWS charts for triggers and their notes for evidence of morbidity. Two hundred patients (30%) triggered and 86 patients (13%) had morbidity according to our criteria, including haemorrhage (43%), hypertensive disease of pregnancy (31%) and suspected infection (20%). The MEOWS was 89% sensitive (95% CI 81-95%), 79% specific (95% CI 76-82%), with a positive predictive value 39% (95% CI 32-46%) and a negative predictive value of 98% (95% CI 96-99%). There were no admissions to the intensive care unit, cardio respiratory arrests or deaths during the study period. This study suggests that MEOWS is a useful bedside tool for predicting morbidity. Adjustment of the trigger parameters may improve positive predictive value.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Goldhill D R, White S A, Sumner A. Physiological values and procedures in the 24 h before ICU admission from the ward. Anaesthesia 1999; 54: 529-34.
    1. Cullinane M, Findlay G, Hargraves C, Lucas S. An Acute Problem?. London: National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death, 2005.
    1. Goldhill D R, McNarry A F, Mandersloot G, McGinley A. A physiologically-based early warning score for ward patients: the association between score and outcome. Anaesthesia 2005; 60: 547-53.
    1. Gao H, McDonnell A, Harrison DA, et al. Harvey Systematic review and evaluation of physiological track and trigger warning systems for identifying at risk patients on the ward. Intensive Care Medicine 2007; 33: 667-79.
    1. Lewis G (ed.) Saving Mothers’ Lives: Reviewing maternal Deaths to make Motherhood Safer 2003-2005. The Seventh Confidential Enquiry into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. London: CEMACH, 2007.

Publication types

MeSH terms