Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Jan;21(1):45-52.
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0815. Epub 2011 Nov 8.

Patient activation increases colorectal cancer screening rates: a randomized trial among low-income minority patients

Mira L Katz  1 , James L Fisher, Kelly Fleming, Electra D Paskett
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Patient activation increases colorectal cancer screening rates: a randomized trial among low-income minority patients

Mira L Katz et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates remain low among low-income and minority populations. The purpose of this study was to determine whether providing patients with screening information, activating them to ask for a screening test, and telephone barriers counseling improves CRC screening rates compared with providing screening information only.

Methods: Patients were randomized to CRC screening information plus patient activation and barriers counseling (n = 138) or CRC screening information (n = 132). Barriers counseling was attempted among activated patients if screening was not completed after one month. CRC screening test completion was determined by medical record review at two months after the medical visit. Logistic regression was used to determine whether activated patients were more likely to complete CRC screening, after adjustment for confounding factors (e.g., demographic characteristics and CRC knowledge).

Results: Patients were African American (72.2%), female (63.7%), had annual household incomes less than $20,000 (60.7%), no health insurance (57.0%), and limited health literacy skills (53.7%). In adjusted analyses, more patients randomized to the activation group completed a screening test (19.6% vs. 9.9%; OR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.14-5.56; P = 0.020). In addition, more activated patients reported discussing screening with their provider (54.4% vs. 27.5%, OR = 3.29, 95% CI: 1.95-5.56; P < 0.001) and had more screening tests ordered (39.1% vs. 17.6%; OR = 3.40, 95% CI: 1.88-6.15; P < 0.001) compared with those in the control group.

Conclusion: Patient activation increased CRC screening rates among low-income minority patients.

Impact: Innovative strategies are still needed to increase CRC screening discussions, motivate providers to recommend screening to patients, as well as assist patients to complete ordered screening tests.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Study flow of participants, CONSORT diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. American Cancer Society. Colorectal Cancer Facts and Figures 2011–2013. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2011.
    1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2011. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2011.
    1. Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening, incidence, and mortality— United States, 2002–2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60:884–889. - PubMed
    1. Naishadham D, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Siegel R, Cokkinides V, Jemal A. State disparities in colorectal cancer mortality patterns in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:1296–1302. - PubMed
    1. Zapka J. Innovative provider- and health system-directed approaches to improving colorectal cancer screening delivery. Med Care. 2008;46:S62–S67. - PubMed

Publication types