Barriers to staff adoption of a surgical safety checklist
- PMID: 22069112
- PMCID: PMC3285141
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000094
Barriers to staff adoption of a surgical safety checklist
Abstract
Objective: Implementation of a surgical checklist depends on many organisational factors and on socio-cultural patterns. The objective of this study was to identify barriers to effective implementation of a surgical checklist and to develop a best use strategy.
Setting: 18 cancer centres in France.
Design: The authors first assessed use compliance and completeness rates of the surgical checklist on a random sample of 80 surgical procedures performed under general or loco-regional anaesthesia in each of the 18 centres. They then developed a typology of the organisational and cultural barriers to effective checklist implementation and defined each barrier's contents using data from collective and semi-structured individual interviews of key staff, the results of an email questionnaire sent to the 18 centres, and direct observations over 20 h in two centres.
Results: The study consisted of 1440 surgical procedures, 1299 checklists, and 28 578 items. The mean compliance rate was 90.2% (0, 100). The mean completion rate was 61% (0, 84). 11 barriers to effective checklist implementation were identified. Their incidence varied widely across centres. The main barriers were duplication of items within existing checklists (16/18 centres), poor communication between surgeon and anaesthetist (10/18), time spent completing the checklist for no perceived benefit, and lack of understanding and timing of item checks (9/18), ambiguity (8/18), unaccounted risks (7/18) and a time-honoured hierarchy (6/18).
Conclusions: Several of the barriers to the successful implementation of the surgical checklist depended on organisational and cultural factors within each centre. The authors propose a strategy for change for checklist design, use and assessment, which could be used to construct a feedback loop for local team organisation and national initiatives.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al. ; Safe Surgery Saves Lives Study Group A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 2009;360:491–9 - PubMed
-
- De Vries EN, Prins HA, Crolla RM, et al. ; SURPASS Collaborative Group Effect of a comprehensive surgical safety system on patient outcomes. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1963–5 - PubMed
-
- Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al. ; Safe Surgery Saves Lives Study Group Changes in safety attitude and relationship to decreased postoperative morbidity and mortality following implementation of a checklist-based surgical safety intervention. Qual Saf Health Care 2011;20:102–7 - PubMed
-
- De Vries EN, Eikens-Jansen MP, Hamersma AM, et al. Prevention of surgical malpractice claims by use of a surgical safety checklist. Ann Surg 2011;253:624–8 - PubMed
-
- Vats A, Vincent CA, Nagpal K, et al. Practical challenges of introducing WHO surgical checklist: UK pilot experience. BMJ 2010;340:b5433. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical