Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Mar;21(3):191-7.
doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000094. Epub 2011 Nov 7.

Barriers to staff adoption of a surgical safety checklist

Affiliations

Barriers to staff adoption of a surgical safety checklist

Aude Fourcade et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: Implementation of a surgical checklist depends on many organisational factors and on socio-cultural patterns. The objective of this study was to identify barriers to effective implementation of a surgical checklist and to develop a best use strategy.

Setting: 18 cancer centres in France.

Design: The authors first assessed use compliance and completeness rates of the surgical checklist on a random sample of 80 surgical procedures performed under general or loco-regional anaesthesia in each of the 18 centres. They then developed a typology of the organisational and cultural barriers to effective checklist implementation and defined each barrier's contents using data from collective and semi-structured individual interviews of key staff, the results of an email questionnaire sent to the 18 centres, and direct observations over 20 h in two centres.

Results: The study consisted of 1440 surgical procedures, 1299 checklists, and 28 578 items. The mean compliance rate was 90.2% (0, 100). The mean completion rate was 61% (0, 84). 11 barriers to effective checklist implementation were identified. Their incidence varied widely across centres. The main barriers were duplication of items within existing checklists (16/18 centres), poor communication between surgeon and anaesthetist (10/18), time spent completing the checklist for no perceived benefit, and lack of understanding and timing of item checks (9/18), ambiguity (8/18), unaccounted risks (7/18) and a time-honoured hierarchy (6/18).

Conclusions: Several of the barriers to the successful implementation of the surgical checklist depended on organisational and cultural factors within each centre. The authors propose a strategy for change for checklist design, use and assessment, which could be used to construct a feedback loop for local team organisation and national initiatives.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Surgical safety checklist published by the French National Authority for Health (HAS) (January 2010 version*). An updated version was published in January 2011.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Rates of compliance of use (A) and completeness (B) recorded for the surgical checklist.

References

    1. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al. ; Safe Surgery Saves Lives Study Group A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 2009;360:491–9 - PubMed
    1. De Vries EN, Prins HA, Crolla RM, et al. ; SURPASS Collaborative Group Effect of a comprehensive surgical safety system on patient outcomes. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1963–5 - PubMed
    1. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al. ; Safe Surgery Saves Lives Study Group Changes in safety attitude and relationship to decreased postoperative morbidity and mortality following implementation of a checklist-based surgical safety intervention. Qual Saf Health Care 2011;20:102–7 - PubMed
    1. De Vries EN, Eikens-Jansen MP, Hamersma AM, et al. Prevention of surgical malpractice claims by use of a surgical safety checklist. Ann Surg 2011;253:624–8 - PubMed
    1. Vats A, Vincent CA, Nagpal K, et al. Practical challenges of introducing WHO surgical checklist: UK pilot experience. BMJ 2010;340:b5433. - PubMed

Publication types