Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Mar;3(3):191-200.
doi: 10.3390/toxins3030191. Epub 2011 Mar 15.

Monitoring radiographic brain tumor progression

Affiliations
Review

Monitoring radiographic brain tumor progression

Ankit I Mehta et al. Toxins (Basel). 2011 Mar.

Abstract

Determining radiographic progression in primary malignant brain tumors has posed a significant challenge to the neuroncology community. Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM, WHO Grade IV) through its inherent heterogeneous enhancement, growth patterns, and irregular nature has been difficult to assess for progression. Our ability to detect tumor progression radiographically remains inadequate. Despite the advanced imaging techniques, detecting tumor progression continues to be a clinical challenge. Here we review the different criteria used to detect tumor progression, and highlight the inherent challenges with detection of progression.

Keywords: MRI; glioblastoma; radiographic progression; tumor progression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Traditional Non-Volumetric Measurements do not Adequately Describe Residual Enhancement in Surgical Resection Cavities. (A) This schematic resection cavity has residual rim enhancement in gray. RECIST criteria measurement ‘A’ or ‘a’ or ‘b’ or Macdonald criteria measurement ‘A*B’ or ‘a*b’ would not adequately describe residual tumor volume and additional tumor growth around the rim or collapse of the resection cavity may be over- or under-interpreted. (B) Differences in axial slice acquisition also impact measurements made by traditional criteria more than volumetric measurements. One scan could obtain axial slice ‘c’ with enhancing tumor measurement ‘x’ but a subsequent scan in the same patient could obtain axial slice ‘d’, causing an incorrect assessment of tumor response. (Reprinted with permission from PLOSOne [15]).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Automated Assessment of Enhancing Tumor Volume. (A) T1-weighted post-contrast axial images are automatically fused with the pre-contrast sequences. (B) The tumor region of interest (blue area) and nearby normal brain (purple area) are outlined roughly by hand. (C) The enhancing nasal mucosa region is automatically detected with a built-in anatomic atlas (red area) and serves as a threshold for enhancement. (D) Tissue that is present on the post-contrast images but not the pre-contrast that is above the enhancement threshold appears in yellow. This includes enhancing tissue such as vasculature, tumor, and superficial structures. Enhancing tumor volume is defined as the green area within the manually-defined blue tumor region of interest. (Reprinted with permission from PLOSOne [15]).

References

    1. Fogh S.E., Andrews D.W., Glass J., Curran W., Glass C., Champ C., Evans J.J., Hyslop T., Pequignot E., Downes B., et al. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy: An effective therapy for recurrent high-grade gliomas. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010;28:3048–3053. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gururangan S., Krauser J., Watral M.A., Driscoll T., Larrier N., Reardon D.A., Rich J.N., Quinn J.A., Vredenburgh J.J., Desjardins A., et al. Efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy or standard salvage therapy in patients with recurrent medulloblastoma. Neuro. Oncol. 2008;10:745–751. doi: 10.1215/15228517-2008-044. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang S.C., Wikstrom M.G., White D.L., Klaveness J., Holtz E., Rongved P., Moseley M.E., Brasch R.C. Evaluation of Gd-DTPA-labeled dextran as an intravascular MR contrast agent: Imaging characteristics in normal rat tissues. Radiology. 1990;175:483–488. - PubMed
    1. Macdonald D.R., Cascino T.L., Schold S.C., Jr., Cairncross J.G. Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J. Clin. Oncol. 1990;8:1277–1280. - PubMed
    1. Brandes A.A., Franceschi E., Tosoni A., Blatt V., Pession A., Tallini G., Bertorelle R., Bartolini S., Calbucci F., Andreoli A., et al. MGMT promoter methylation status can predict the incidence and outcome of pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008;26:2192–2197. - PubMed

MeSH terms