Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2011 Oct;133(10):104501.
doi: 10.1115/1.4005176.

The association of wall mechanics and morphology: a case study of abdominal aortic aneurysm growth

Affiliations
Case Reports

The association of wall mechanics and morphology: a case study of abdominal aortic aneurysm growth

Christopher B Washington et al. J Biomech Eng. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the potential correlation between peak wall stress (PWS) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) morphology and how it relates to aneurysm rupture potential. Using in-house segmentation and meshing software, six 3-dimensional (3D) AAA models from a single patient followed for 28 months were generated for finite element analysis. For the AAA wall, both isotropic and anisotropic materials were used, while an isotropic material was used for the intraluminal thrombus (ILT). These models were also used to calculate 36 geometric indices characteristic of the aneurysm morphology. Using least squares regression, seven significant geometric features (p < 0.05) were found to characterize the AAA morphology during the surveillance period. By means of nonlinear regression, PWS estimated with the anisotropic material was found to be highly correlated with three of these features: maximum diameter (r = 0.992, p = 0.002), sac volume (r = 0.989, p = 0.003) and diameter to diameter ratio (r = 0.947, p = 0.033). The correlation of wall mechanics with geometry is nonlinear and reveals that PWS does not increase concomitantly with aneurysm diameter. This suggests that a quantitative characterization of AAA morphology may be advantageous in assessing rupture risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Time dependency of maximum aneurysm diameter (Dmax) and peak wall stress (PWS) for the isotropic and anisotropic wall material models during the surveillance period
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Peak wall stress (PWS) relative to the seven significant geometric indices: (a) maximum aneurysm diameter (Dmax); (b) height (H); (c) length (L); (d) maximum diameter to height ratio (DHr); (e) maximum diameter to proximal neck diameter ratio (DDr); (f) aneurysm sac volume (V); (g) intraluminal thrombus volume (VILT)

References

    1. Fillinger, M. F. , Marra, S. P. , Raghavan, M. L. , and Kennedy, F. E. , 2003, “Prediction of Rupture Risk in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm During Observation: Wall Stress Versus Diameter,” J. Vasc. Surg., 37(4), pp. 724–732.10.1067/mva.2003.213 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fillinger, M. F. , Raghavan, M. L. , Marra, S. P. , Cronenwett, J. L. , and Kennedy, F. E. , 2002, “In Vivo Analysis of Mechanical Wall Stress and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture Risk,” J. Vasc. Surg., 36(3), pp. 589–597.10.1067/mva.2002.125478 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shum, J. D. , Martino, E. S. , Goldhammer, A. , Goldman, D. , Acker, L. , Patel, G. , Ng, J. H. , Martufi, G. , and Finol, E. A. , 2010, “Semi-Automatic Vessel Wall Detection and Quantification of Wall Thickness in Computed Tomography Images of Human Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms,” Med. Phys., 37, pp. 638–648.10.1118/1.3284976 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martufi, G. D. , Martino, E. S. , Amon, C. H. , Muluk, S. C. , and Finol, E. A. , 2009, “Three-Dimensional Geometric Characterization of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Image-Based Wall Thickness,” J. Biomech. Eng., 131, pp. 610151–6101511 .10.1115/1.3127256 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Raghavan, M. L. , and Vorp D. A., 2000, “Toward a Biomechanical Tool to Evaluate Rupture Potential of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Identification of a Finite Strain Constitutive Model and Evaluation of its Applicability,” J. Biomech., 33, pp. 475–482.10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00201-8 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types