A novel, nonbinary evaluation of success and failure reveals bupropion efficacy versus methamphetamine dependence: reanalysis of a multisite trial
- PMID: 22070720
- PMCID: PMC6493362
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-5949.2011.00263.x
A novel, nonbinary evaluation of success and failure reveals bupropion efficacy versus methamphetamine dependence: reanalysis of a multisite trial
Abstract
A multisite, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of bupropion for methamphetamine dependence was reanalyzed using a novel, nonbinary method of evaluating success and failure. The original analysis focused on a group response endpoint (the change in percentage of participants with methamphetamine-free urines each week over the course of the trial) and no significant bupropion effect was observed in the total population of study participants. In this reanalysis, individual participants were regarded as treatment success if they achieved multiple weeks of abstinence lasting through the end of the study, and their degree of success was quantified by calculating the number of beyond-threshold weeks of success (NOBWOS). Thus, setting the threshold at 1 week of end-of-study abstinence (EOSA), treatment successes were assigned NOBWOS values ranging from 1 to 11, with 1 corresponding to 2 weeks EOSA and 11 corresponding to abstinence throughput the entire 12-week trial. Treatment failures were assigned a value of 0. Comparison of NOBWOS values revealed a significant effect of bupropion to facilitate abstinence (P= 0.0176). In the bupropion group, 20% of participants achieved 2 or more weeks EOSA, 14% achieved 6 or more weeks EOSA, and 6% were abstinent throughout the trial; this compares with 7%, 4%, and 1% in the placebo group, respectively. On the basis of the NOBWOS analysis, bupropion seems to effectively facilitate the achievement of abstinence in methamphetamine-dependent individuals.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures


Comment in
-
Reanalysis of methamphetamine dependence treatment trial.CNS Neurosci Ther. 2012 May;18(5):367-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5949.2011.00288.x. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2012. PMID: 22533722 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Montoya ID, McCann DJ. Drugs of abuse: Management of intoxication and antidotes In: Luch A, editor. Molecular, clinical and environmental toxicology: Clinical toxicology, Vol. 2. Basel : Birkhäuser Verlag AG, 2009;519–541. - PubMed
-
- Shoptaw S, Reback CJ. Methamphetamine use and infectious disease‐related behaviors in men who have sex with men: Implications for interventions. Addiction 2007; 102:130–135. - PubMed
-
- Nicosia N, Pacula RL, Kilmer B, Lundberg R, Chiesa J. The economic costs of methamphetamine use in the United States, 2005. RAND Corporation [Internet]. 2009; MG‐829‐MPF/NIDA. Available from: http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG829/ [Accessed 30 January 2011.
-
- United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime . World Drug Report 2009 [Internet]. 2009; http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data‐and‐analysis/WDR‐2009.html [Accessed 30 January 2011.