Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Nov 9:10:203.
doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-10-203.

Effects of undenatured whey protein supplementation on CXCL12- and CCL21-mediated B and T cell chemotaxis in diabetic mice

Affiliations

Effects of undenatured whey protein supplementation on CXCL12- and CCL21-mediated B and T cell chemotaxis in diabetic mice

Gamal Badr et al. Lipids Health Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Long and persistent uncontrolled diabetes tends to degenerate the immune system and leads to an increased incidence of infection. Whey proteins (WPs) enhance immunity during early life and have a protective role in some immune disorders. In this study, the effects of camel WP on the chemotaxis of B and T cells to CXCL12 and CCL21 in diabetic mice were investigated.

Results: Flow cytometric analysis of the surface expressions of CXCR4 (CXCL12 receptor) and CCR7 (CCL21 receptor) on B and T cells revealed that the surface expressions of CXCR4 and CCR7 were not significantly altered in diabetic and WP-supplemented diabetic mice compared with control mice. Nevertheless, B and T lymphocytes from diabetic mice were found to be in a stunned state, with a marked and significant (P < 0.05) decrease in CXCL12- and CCL21-mediated actin polymerization and subsequently, a marked decrease in their chemotaxis. WP supplementation in the diabetes model was found to significantly increase CXCL12- and CCL21-mediated actin polymerization and chemotaxis in both B and T cells.

Conclusion: Our data revealed the benefits of WP supplementation in enhancing cytoskeletal rearrangement and chemotaxis in B and T cells, and subsequently improving the immune response in diabetic mice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Surface expression of CXCR4 and CCR7 on B and T cells. Surface CXCR4 and CCR7 expression levels were analyzed with flow cytometry on B and T cells of the control mice (open histograms, thin line), diabetic mice (open histograms, black bold line) and diabetic mice supplemented with WP (gray-filled histograms, thin line) using anti-CXCR4-PE, anti-CCR7-PE and IgG (open histogram) isotype control antibodies. Histograms were gated based on viable B220+ B cells (A) and CD3+ T cells (B).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Impact of WP supplementation on actin polymerization in B cells. B cells were isolated from control (open circles), diabetic (closed black circles), and WP-treated diabetic groups (closed gray triangles). F-actin polymerization was measured in response to CXCL12 (A) and CCL21 (B). The results are expressed as the percentage changes in MFI (n = 10) ± SD as described in the Materials and Methods section.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Impact of WP supplementation on actin polymerization in T cells. T cells were isolated from the control (open circles), diabetic (closed black circles), and WP-treated diabetic groups (closed gray triangles). F-actin polymerization was measured in response to CXCL12 (A) and CCL21 (B). The results are expressed as the percentage changes in MFI (n = 8) ± SD as described in the Materials and Methods section.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Whey protein restores B cell chemotaxis in diabetic mice. Splenic B cells were isolated from 10 mice in each group and were analyzed for migration to CXCL12 and CCL21. Input populations and migrated cell populations were stained with B220-APC and IgD-PE/CD44-FITC. Representative dot plots of input cells and transmigrated cells to medium (without chemokine) versus medium containing CXCL12 for control mice are shown, including the input and transmigrated B cell population data. Data from one representative experiment are shown in panel A. The percentage of B cells from 10 different mice in the control (open bars), diabetic (closed, black bars) and WP-treated diabetic (closed, gray bars) groups that specifically migrated to chemokines are shown. The results are expressed as the mean specific migration ± SEM. *P < 0.05, diabetic vs. control; #P < 0.05, diabetic vs. WP-treated groups.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Whey protein restores T cell chemotaxis in diabetic mice. T cells were isolated from 10 mice in each group and analyzed for migration to CXCL12 and CCL21. Input populations and migrated cell populations were stained with CD3-FITC. The percentage of T cells from 10 different mice in the control (open bars), diabetic (closed, black bars) and WP-treated diabetic (closed, gray bars) groups that specifically migrated to chemokines are shown. The results are expressed as the mean specific migration ± SEM. *P < 0.05, diabetic vs. control; #P < 0.05, diabetic vs. WP-treated groups.

References

    1. Thompson CS. Animal models of diabetes mellitus: relevance to vascular complications. Curr Pharm Des. 2008;14:309–324. doi: 10.2174/138161208783497679. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smitherman KO, Peacock JE. Infectious emergencies in patients with diabetes mellitus. Med Clin North Am. 1995;79:53–77. - PubMed
    1. Mikulkova Z, Praksova P, Stourac P, Bednarik J, Strajtova L, Pacasova R, Belobradkova J, Dite P, Michalek J. Numerical defects in CD8+CD28- T-suppressor lymphocyte population in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and multiple sclerosis. Cell Immunol. 2010;262:75–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2010.02.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zeidler A, Shargill NS, Chan TM. Peripheral insulin insensitivity in the hyperglycemic athymic nude mouse: similarity to noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1991;196:457–460. - PubMed
    1. Toldi G, Vásárhelyi B, Kaposi A, Mészáros G, Pánczél P, Hosszufalusi N, Tulassay T, Treszl A. Lymphocyte activation in type 1 diabetes mellitus: the increased significance of Kv1.3 potassium channels. Immunol Lett. 2010;133:35–41. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2010.06.009. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms