Detecting pregnancy use of non-hormonal category X medications in electronic medical records
- PMID: 22071529
- PMCID: PMC3241158
- DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000057
Detecting pregnancy use of non-hormonal category X medications in electronic medical records
Abstract
Objectives: To determine whether a rule-based algorithm applied to an outpatient electronic medical record (EMR) can identify patients who are pregnant and prescribed medications proved to cause birth defects.
Design: A descriptive study using the University of Pennsylvania Health System outpatient EMR to simulate a prospective algorithm to identify exposures during pregnancy to category X medications, soon enough to intervene and potentially prevent the exposure. A subsequent post-hoc algorithm was also tested, working backwards from pregnancy endpoints, to search for possible exposures that should have been detected.
Measurements: Category X medications prescribed to pregnant patients.
Results: The alert simulation identified 2201 pregnancies with 16,969 pregnancy months (excluding abortions and ectopic pregnancies). Of these, 30 appeared to have an order for a non-hormone category X medication during pregnancy. However, none of the 30 'exposed pregnancies' were confirmed as true exposures in medical records review. The post-hoc algorithm identified 5841 pregnancies with 64 exposed pregnancies in 52,569 risk months, only one of which was a confirmed case.
Conclusions: Category X medications may indeed be used in pregnancy, although rarely. However, most patients identified by the algorithm as exposed in pregnancy were not truly exposed. Therefore, implementing an electronic warning without evaluation would have inconvenienced prescribers, possibly hurting some patients (leading to non-use of needed drugs), with no benefit. These data demonstrate that computerized physician order entry interventions should be selected and evaluated carefully even before their use, using alert simulations such as that performed here, rather than just taken off the shelf and accepted as credible without formal evaluation.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- Briggs GG, Freeman RK, Jaffe SJ, eds. Drugs in Pregnancy and Lactation, 7th edn Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, 2005
-
- Cooper WO, Hickson GB, Ray WA. Prescriptions for contraindicated category X drugs in pregnancy among women enrolled in TennCare. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2004;18:106–11 - PubMed
-
- Andrade SE, Gurwitz JH, Davis RL, et al. Prescription drug use in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:398–407 - PubMed
-
- Hardy JR, Leaderer BP, Holford TR, et al. Safety of medications prescribed before and during early pregnancy in a cohort of 81,975 mothers from the UK General Practice Research Database. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2006;15:555–64 - PubMed
-
- Yang T, Walker MC, Krewski D, et al. Maternal characteristics associated with pregnancy exposure to FDA category C, D, and X drugs in a Canadian population. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2008;17:270–7 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
