Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2011 Nov 9:(11):CD007412.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007412.pub3.

Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour

Cecily M Begley  1 , Gillian M L Gyte, Declan Devane, William McGuire, Andrew Weeks
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour

Cecily M Begley et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Update in

Abstract

Background: Active management of the third stage of labour involves giving a prophylactic uterotonic, early cord clamping and controlled cord traction to deliver the placenta. With expectant management, signs of placental separation are awaited and the placenta is delivered spontaneously. Active management was introduced to try to reduce haemorrhage, a major contributor to maternal mortality in low-income countries.

Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of active versus expectant management of the third stage of labour.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Trials Register (15 February 2011).

Selection criteria: Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing active versus expectant management of the third stage of labour.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently assessed the studies for inclusion, assessed risk of bias and carried out data extraction.

Main results: We included seven studies (involving 8247 women), all undertaken in hospitals, six in high-income countries and one in a low-income country. Four studies compared active versus expectant management, and three compared active versus a mixture of managements. We used random-effects in the analyses because of clinical heterogeneity. There was an absence of high quality evidence for our primary outcomes. The evidence suggested that for women at mixed levels of risk of bleeding, active management showed a reduction in the average risk of maternal primary haemorrhage at time of birth (more than 1000 mL) (average risk ratio (RR) 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14 to 0.87, three studies, 4636 women) and of maternal haemoglobin (Hb) less than 9 g/dL following birth (average RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.83, two studies, 1572 women). We also found no difference in the incidence in admission of infants to neonatal units (average RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.11, two studies, 3207 women) nor in the incidence of infant jaundice requiring treatment (0.96, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.68, two studies, 3142 women). There were no data on our other primary outcomes of very severe postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) at the time of birth (more than 2500 mL), maternal mortality, or neonatal polycythaemia needing treatment.Active management also showed a significant decrease in primary blood loss greater than 500 mL, and mean maternal blood loss at birth, maternal blood transfusion and therapeutic uterotonics during the third stage or within the first 24 hours, or both and significant increases in maternal diastolic blood pressure, vomiting after birth, after-pains, use of analgesia from birth up to discharge from the labour ward and more women returning to hospital with bleeding (outcome not pre-specified). There was also a decrease in the baby's birthweight with active management, reflecting the lower blood volume from interference with placental transfusion.In the subgroup of women at low risk of excessive bleeding, there were similar findings, except there was no significant difference identified between groups for severe haemorrhage or maternal Hb less than 9 g/dL (at 24 to 72 hours).Hypertension and interference with placental transfusion might be avoided by using modifications to the active management package, e.g. omitting ergot and deferring cord clamping, but we have no direct evidence of this here.

Authors' conclusions: Although there is a lack of high quality evidence, active management of the third stage reduced the risk of haemorrhage greater than 1000 mL at the time of birth in a population of women at mixed risk of excessive bleeding, but adverse effects were identified. Women should be given information on the benefits and harms of both methods to support informed choice. Given the concerns about early cord clamping and the potential adverse effects of some uterotonics, it is critical now to look at the individual components of third-stage management. Data are also required from low-income countries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Methodological quality summary: review authors’ judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

References

    1. Begley CM. Comparative studies in the third stage of labour [thesis] Trinity College, University of Dublin, Ireland; Dublin: 1989.

    2. *

    3. Begley CM. A comparison of ‘active’ and ‘physiological’ management of the third stage of labour. Midwifery. 1990;6:3–17. - PubMed
    4. Begley CM. Personal communication. 1987. A comparison of physiological and pharmacological methods of managing the third stage of labour.
    5. Begley CM. The effect of ergometrine on breast feeding. Midwifery. 1990;6:60–72. [published and unpublished data] - PubMed
    1. Jangsten E, Mattsson LA, Lyckestam I, Hellstrom AL, Berg M. A comparison of active management and expectant management of the third stage of labour: a Swedish randomised controlled trial. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2011. 2011;118(3):362–369. [published and unpublished data] - PubMed
    1. Jerbi M, Hidar S, Elmoueddeb, Chaieb A, Khairi H. Oxytocin in the third stage of labor. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2007;96(3):198–9. [published data only] - PubMed
    1. Khan GQ, John IS, Wani S, Doherty T, Sibai BM. Controlled cord traction versus minimal intervention techniques in delivery of the placenta: a randomised controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1997;177(4):770–4. [published data only] - PubMed
    1. Elbourne DR, Harding J. The Bristol Third Stage Trial; Proceedings of Research and the Midwives Conference; Manchester, UK. 1989.1989. pp. 19–31.
    2. Harding JE, Elbourne DR, Prendiville WJ. Views of mothers and midwives participating in the Bristol randomized, controlled trial of active management of the third stage of labor. Birth. 1989;16:1–6. - PubMed

    3. *

    4. Prendiville WJ, Harding JE, Elbourne DR, Stirrat GM. The Bristol third stage trial: active versus physiological management of third stage of labour. BMJ. 1988;297:1295–300. [published data only] - PMC - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

    1. Abdel-Aleem H, Singata M, Abdel-Aleem M, Mshweshwe N, Williams X, Hofmeyr GJ. Uterine massage to reduce postpartum hemorrhage after vaginal delivery. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2010;111(1):32–6. [published data only] - PubMed

    1. *

    2. Hoffman M, Castagnola D, Naqvi F. A randomized trial of active versus expectant management of the third stage of labor [abstract] American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2006;195(6 Suppl 1):S107.
    3. Hoffman M, Naqvi F, Sciscione A. A randomized trial of active versus expectant management of the third stage of labor [abstract] American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2004;191(6 Suppl 1):S82. [published data only]
    1. Kashanian M, Fekrat M, Masoomi Z, Ansari NS. Comparison of active and expectant management on the duration of the third stage of labour and the amount of blood loss during the third and fourth stage of labour: a randomised controlled trial. Midwifery. 2010;26(2):241–5. [published data only] - PubMed
    1. Magann EF, Doherty DA, Briery CM, Niederhauser A, Chauhan SP, Morrison JC. Obstetric characteristics for a prolonged third stage of labor and risk for postpartum hemorrhage. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation. 2008;65(3):201–5. [published data only] - PubMed

    2. *

    3. Magann EF, Doherty DA, Briery CM, Niederhauser A, Morrison JC. Timing of placental delivery to prevent post-partum haemorrhage: lessons learned from an abandoned randomised clinical trial. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2006;46(6):549–51. [published data only] - PubMed
    1. Muller R, Beck G. Active management of the third stage of labour; 19th Swiss Congress of the Swiss Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics; Interlaken, Switzerland. 1996 June; 1996. [published data only]

References to studies awaiting assessment

    1. Rosario YP Do, Jain CK. Active management of third stage of labour. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India. 1973;23(1):66–9. [published data only]

References to ongoing studies

    1. Gülmezoglu AM, Widmer M, Merialdi M, Qureshi Z, Piaggio G, Elbourne D, et al. Active management of the third stage of labour without controlled cord traction: a randomized non-inferiority controlled trial. Reproductive Health. 2009;6:2. DOI: 10.1186/1742-4755-6-2. [published data only] - PMC - PubMed

Additional references

    1. Abouzaher C. Antepartum and postpartum haemorrhage. In: Murray CJL, Lopez AD, editors. Health Dimensions of Sex and Reproduction. Harvard University Press; Boston: 1998. pp. 172–4.
    1. Bais J, Eskes M, Pel M, Bonsel G, Bleker O. Postpartum haemorrhage in nulliparous women: incidence and risk factors in low and high risk women. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2004;115(2):166–72. - PubMed
    1. Begley C, Devane D, Clarke M. An evaluation of midwifery led care in the Health Service Executive North Eastern area: the report of the MidU study. Health Service Executive; Dublin: Dec, 2009.
    1. Blackburn S. Physiological third stage of labour and birth at home. In: Edwins J, editor. Community Midwifery Practice. Blackwell Publishing; Oxford: 2008.
    1. Bloomfield TH, Gordon H. Reaction to blood loss at delivery. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1990;10(Suppl 2):S13–S16.

References to other published versions of this review

    1. Begley CM, Gyte GML, Murphy DJ, Devane D, McDonald SJ, McGuire W. Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2010;(7) DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007412.pub2. - PubMed
    1. Prendiville WJ, Elbourne D, McDonald S. Active versus expectant management in the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2000;(3) DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000007. - PubMed