Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jan;36(1):186-91.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1337-7.

Bridging the gap with an ileocolonic graft after extensive colorectal resections

Affiliations

Bridging the gap with an ileocolonic graft after extensive colorectal resections

B Dauser et al. World J Surg. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Ileocecal interposition (ICI) for first-line reconstruction after low anterior colorectal resection was introduced by von Flüe and Harder in 1994 (Dis Colon Rectum 37:1160-1162, 1994). We report our experience using this technique to bridge colonic gaps after significant loss of bowel length.

Patients and methods: Between 1999 and 2009 the left-sided colon was too short for traditional isoperistaltic reconstruction in six patients treated in our hospital. Reasons for extensive bowel loss were a deficient (n = 3) or torn (n = 1) marginal artery with ischemia or repeat colorectal resections (n = 2). An ICI was done to bridge the gap and enable restoration of intestinal continuity.

Results: No patient died. Whenever performing a coloanal anastomosis (4/6) a loop ileostomy was raised. One patient with colonic diversion experienced graft-related complications: ischemic colitis of the interposed colonic segment, anastomotic stenosis, and a presacral sinus were observed and managed nonoperatively. Subsequent closure of the stoma was possible in all cases. A median Vaizey incontinence score of 9 (range: 4-14) was recorded in the patient with coloanal anastomosis. The average number of bowel movements per day was 1.5 (range: 0.5-6).

Conclusions: When the descending colon does not reach the rectal stump or anal canal in reoperative cases or after vascular complication, ICI is a useful salvage procedure resulting in good bowel function.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Chirurg. 1994 Sep;65(9):804-6 - PubMed
    1. Arch Surg. 1978 Aug;113(8):1004-5 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 2010 Jun;251(6):1092-7 - PubMed
    1. Colorectal Dis. 2010 Apr;12(4):351-7 - PubMed
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Mar;54(3):360-2 - PubMed

Publication types