Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Nov 9;31(45):16117-24.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4099-11.2011.

The placebo effect: advances from different methodological approaches

Affiliations
Review

The placebo effect: advances from different methodological approaches

Karin Meissner et al. J Neurosci. .

Abstract

There is accumulating evidence from different methodological approaches that the placebo effect is a neurobiological phenomenon. Behavioral, psychophysiological, and neuroimaging results have largely contributed to accepting the placebo response as real. A major aspect of recent and future advances in placebo research is to demonstrate linkages between behavior, brain, and bodily responses. This article provides an overview of the processes involved in the formation of placebo responses by combining research findings from behavioral, psychophysiological, and neuroimaging methods. The integration of these different methodological approaches is a key objective, motivating our scientific pursuits toward a placebo research that can inform and guide important future scientific knowledge.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The scheme shows how psychosocial signals including conditioning, verbal and observational cues are detected by the brain, interpreted, and translated into neural inputs crucial to form expectations and placebo responses resulting in behavior and clinical changes (adapted from Colloca and Miller, 2011a).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Consistent placebo-related neuroimaging findings from 2004 to 2011. A complete list of studies can be found in Wager and Fields (2011). A, Placebo-related decreases during pain, or regions in which placebo-related decreases were correlated with placebo analgesia. B, Placebo-related increases in neuroimaging activity during anticipation or pain, or regions in which placebo-related increases correlated with placebo analgesia. The top rows show individual peak coordinates (for more details, see Wager and Fields, 2011), and the bottom rows show areas activated in at least three separate maps. Note that increases and decreases can be found in the same brain regions, if, e.g., there are consistent increases during anticipation of pain and decreases during pain experience. This is the case with the rostral dorsal cingulate region shown in both maps.

References

    1. Allan LG, Siegel S. A signal detection theory analysis of the placebo effect. Eval Health Prof. 2002;25:410–420. - PubMed
    1. Amanzio M, Benedetti F. Neuropharmacological dissection of placebo analgesia: expectation-activated opioid systems versus conditioning-activated specific subsystems. J Neurosci. 1999;19:484–494. - PMC - PubMed
    1. André-Obadia N, Magnin M, Garcia-Larrea L. On the importance of placebo timing in rTMS studies for pain relief. Pain. 2011;152:1233–1237. - PubMed
    1. Apkarian AV, Bushnell MC, Treede RD, Zubieta JK. Human brain mechanisms of pain perception and regulation in health and disease. Eur J Pain. 2005;9:463–484. - PubMed
    1. Aslaksen PM, Flaten MA. The roles of physiological and subjective stress in the effectiveness of a placebo on experimentally induced pain. Psychosom Med. 2008;70:811–818. - PubMed

Publication types