Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Nov;7(11):e1002251.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002251. Epub 2011 Nov 3.

High degree of heterogeneity in Alzheimer's disease progression patterns

Affiliations

High degree of heterogeneity in Alzheimer's disease progression patterns

Natalia L Komarova et al. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Nov.

Abstract

There have been several reports on the varying rates of progression among Alzheimer's Disease (AD) patients; however, there has been no quantitative study of the amount of heterogeneity in AD. Obtaining a reliable quantitative measure of AD progression rates and their variances among the patients for each stage of AD is essential for evaluating results of any clinical study. The Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) and Functional Assessment Staging procedure (FAST) characterize seven stages in the course of AD from normal aging to severe dementia. Each GDS/FAST stage has a published mean duration, but the variance is unknown. We use statistical analysis to reconstruct GDS/FAST stage durations in a cohort of 648 AD patients with an average follow-up time of 4.78 years. Calculations for GDS/FAST stages 4-6 reveal that the standard deviations for stage durations are comparable with their mean values, indicating the presence of large variations in the AD progression among patients. Such amount of heterogeneity in the course of progression of AD is consistent with the existence of several sub-groups of AD patients, which differ by their patterns of decline.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The calculated cumulative probability distribution functions for GDS/FAST stage durations.
Figure 2
Figure 2. The mean values and standard deviations calculated for GDS/FAST stages 4–6.
The black bars represent GDS stages, and the gray bars – FAST stages. The mean stage values reported in are presented by dashed horizontal lines.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Some statistics of the dataset.
(a) A histogram showing the number of records per patient. (b) A histogram showing patient inter-visit times.

References

    1. Chui HC. The significance of clinically defined subgroups of Alzheimer's disease. J Neural. 1987;Transm(Suppl 24):57–68. - PubMed
    1. Mann UM, Mohr E, Gearing M, Chase TN. Heterogeneity in Alzheimer's disease: progression rate segregated by distinct neuropsychological and cerebral metabolic profiles. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992;55:956–959. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Craft S, Teri L, Edland SD, Kukull WA, Schellenberg G, et al. Accelerated decline in apolipoprotein E-epsilon4 homozygotes with Alzheimer's disease. Neurology. 1998;51:149–153. - PubMed
    1. Farrer LA, Cupples LA, van Duijn CM, Connor-Lacke L, Kiely DK, et al. Rate of progression of Alzheimer's disease is associated with genetic risk. Arch Neurol. 1995;52:918–923. - PubMed
    1. Murphy GM, Jr, Claassen JD, DeVoss JJ, Pascoe N, Taylor J, et al. Rate of cognitive decline in AD is accelerated by the interleukin-1 alpha -889 *1 allele. Neurology. 2001;56:1595–1597. - PubMed