Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Nov;7(11):e1002260.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002260. Epub 2011 Nov 3.

Stability properties of underdominance in finite subdivided populations

Affiliations

Stability properties of underdominance in finite subdivided populations

Philipp M Altrock et al. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Nov.

Abstract

IN ISOLATED populations underdominance leads to bistable evolutionary dynamics: below a certain mutant allele frequency the wildtype succeeds. Above this point, the potentially underdominant mutant allele fixes. In subdivided populations with gene flow there can be stable states with coexistence of wildtypes and mutants: polymorphism can be maintained because of a migration-selection equilibrium, i.e., selection against rare recent immigrant alleles that tend to be heterozygous. We focus on the stochastic evolutionary dynamics of systems where demographic fluctuations in the coupled populations are the main source of internal noise. We discuss the influence of fitness, migration rate, and the relative sizes of two interacting populations on the mean extinction times of a group of potentially underdominant mutant alleles. We classify realistic initial conditions according to their impact on the stochastic extinction process. Even in small populations, where demographic fluctuations are large, stability properties predicted from deterministic dynamics show remarkable robustness. Fixation of the mutant allele becomes unlikely but the time to its extinction can be long.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Direction of selection in the two population system with migration.
We show a phase portrait of the gradient of selection with formula image. The arrows (length rescaled) indicate the most likely direction of selection given by Eqs. 6–9. The shading indicates the average speed of selection: The darker she shading, the faster the system is expected to leave the given state. Stable fixed points of the replicator dynamics are given by filled disks. Unstable fixed points and saddles are denoted by empty disks. Left panel: The migration rate is below the critical value formula image, such that the replicator dynamics has internal stable fixed points. The number of alleles changes equally fast in both populations formula image. Central panel: For the same migration rate, but with one population changing three times as fast compared to the other (formula image), the selection pattern changes. However, the fixed points of the replicator dynamics Eq. 2 remain the same. Right panel: The stability of the fixed points of the replicator dynamics changes critically with the migration rate formula image. For sufficiently high migration rate, formula image, the system proceeds fast to fixation or loss of the mutant allele.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Stochastic evolution of the mutant allele in two coupled populations.
Typical trajectories for the loss of the mutant allele (extinction process) in a system of two populations of the same size, formula image. We show different realizations of the two dimensional Markov chain. The initial condition is the unstable equilibrium near the center formula image, the final state is formula image in all three cases. The shading indicates the sojourn time (total time spent in a particular state, including waiting times). The brighter the shading, the more often the respective state has been visited, white states were not visited. Left panel: Typically, the process spends long times near the formula image corners, where the waiting times are highest. Center panel: The process proceeds fast to extinction of the mutant allele, but slows down near formula image. Right panel: The process spends most of the time in the formula image corner. Once it proceeds to extinction, it moves fast along a boundary of the allele frequency space, i.e. the mutant allele does not invade the other population again.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Fixation becomes unlikely with decreasing fitness of mutant homozygotes, variance in allele frequency increases with migration rate.
a) The ratio of fixation to loss of the mutant allele in a system of two populations of sizes formula image is shown as a function of the difference of homozygote fitness values formula image, with initial condition formula image, formula image. Results are obtained from formula image independent realizations with a heterozygote fitness of formula image. As formula image approaches formula image, the probability of fixation in both patches goes to zero. b) For four different scenarios of homozygote fitness formula image and migration rate formula image we show the quasi-stationary distribution of the number of mutant alleles in population 1 (formula image, formula image independent realizations with initial conditions formula image). The average number of mutants in population formula image is denoted by formula image, the standard deviation by formula image. As homozygotes become less fit, the distribution does not change significantly. However, formula image increases with migration rate.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Mutant allele's extinction is delayed for small but non-vanishing migration rates.
(a) Histogram of the extinction process and the according extinction times as functions of the migration rate in systems of two equally large populations (formula image, formula image, formula image, formula image). This histogram can be obtained by averaging over sample trajectories such as those shown in Fig. 2. The initial condition is the unstable equilibrium near the center formula image, the outcomes are conditioned on extinction (final state formula image). Histogram across the entire state space, formula image, formula image (formula image realizations). For each state we give a record of the time spent. Black states are never visited, colored states are visited at least once. The brighter the color, the more often the respective state has been visited, which is characterized by a sojourn time in that state. (b) The mean extinction time rescaled by formula image, for three different system sizes as a function of formula image, in a double logarithmic plot. Symbols refer to formula image (squares), formula image (circles), formula image (triangles) (formula image realizations).
Figure 5
Figure 5. Transition from rapid to slow extinction as migration rate decreases.
The mean extinction time as a function of the migration rate (formula image realizations) for formula image, in a double logarithmic plot for mutant homozygote fitness formula image and heterozygote fitness formula image. The initial condition is near the deterministic unstable equilibrium formula image. The arrow indicates the value of critical migration rate of the deterministic replicator dynamics, Eq. 2, formula image. Values for the probability of extinction for the same parameters are formula image (formula image) and formula image (formula image).
Figure 6
Figure 6. Maintenance of polymorphism in a small island population.
a) Histograms of the extinction time on an island population, Eqs. 12,13, for different migration rates in a log-linear plot. Population size is formula image, fitness of mutant homozygotes is formula image, fitness of heterozygotes is formula image. The histograms stem from formula image independent realizations with initial condition formula image. Each arrow indicates the mean extinction time formula image, Eq. 22 (formula image). The values from simulation and the exact formula are in excellent agreement. With decreasing migration rate, the distribution of extinction times broadens significantly. b) For the same set of parameters we show how the (conditional) average extinction time of the mutant allele in a small population converges to the analytical result of the continent-island approximation with formula image and variable formula image (formula image independent realizations).
Figure 7
Figure 7. Searching for an optimal release strategy.
The upper left panel illustrates the deterministic basins of attraction for formula image, formula image, and formula image. The blue line illustrates possible starting points for a release of size formula image for all possible values of the release fraction, formula image, into population 1. Blue disks correspond to points of illustration in the five following panels. The arrow streams represent example trajectories of deterministic dynamics. The following five panels are labeled according to the release fraction formula image. Symbols correspond to the probability of reaching the correspondingly labeled corners (in the upper left panel) and indicate how they change with formula image. Although complete fixation or loss are the only possible long term events, there is a probability that the neighborhood of, e.g., formula image, formula image is reached first, which we refer to here by triangles. In particular, note that the probability ranks interchange at certain population size for formula image and formula image. The three bottom panels, labeled with the respective system sizes, show the corner probabilities as a function of formula image. A release strategy with formula image maximizes the likelihood of transforming both populations. In contrast to that, formula image, maximizes the likelihood of transforming only a target local population. Higher values of formula image then proceed to an increasing likelihood of rapid loss in both populations. All results are obtained from formula image independent realizations.

References

    1. Fisher RA. On the dominance ratio. Proc Roy Soc Edinburgh. 1922;42:321–341.
    1. Wright S. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics. 1931;16:97–159. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haldane JBS. A mathematical theory of natural and artificial selection. Part V. Selection and mutation. Proc Camb Philol Soc. 1927;23:838–844.
    1. Hartl DL, Clark AG. Principles of Population Genetics. 3rd edition. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc; 1997.
    1. Li CC. The stability of an equilibrium and the average fitness of a population. Am Nat. 1955;89:281–295.

Publication types